Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мотивация | Бизнес

Channel

Мотивация | Бизнес

@motivationbussiness

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,263subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001978873214
TypeChannel
Username@motivationbussiness
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/motivationbussiness

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2632,3162,289.57 August 2026 — 2,316 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,316 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,314 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,312 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,308 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,309 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,304 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,301 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,294 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,289 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,288 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,280 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,279 subscribers27 September 2026 — 2,272 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,266 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,263 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 66 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,255–2,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 14:062,263-3
5 Oct 2026, 13:382,266-6
27 Sept 2026, 21:592,272-7
18 Sept 2026, 13:562,279-1
10 Sept 2026, 15:202,280-8
5 Sept 2026, 05:572,288-1
1 Sept 2026, 11:462,289-5
27 Aug 2026, 01:152,294-7
24 Aug 2026, 06:062,301-3
20 Aug 2026, 18:252,304-5
17 Aug 2026, 18:382,309+1
14 Aug 2026, 21:432,308-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:192,312-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:042,314-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:332,316no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:202,316first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

240 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6828.3%
👍6527.1%
❤177.08%
😇156.25%
🙏156.25%
❤‍🔥145.83%
👀125.00%
🤔104.17%
💯93.75%
😎83.33%
👏31.25%
👌20.833%
😨20.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC296 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤖 ИИ постепенно меняет правила игры для малого бизнеса. По данным последних исследований, с 2023 по 2025 год количество компаний без сотрудников с выручкой свыше $1 млн удвоилось, а с выручкой более $10 млн — выросло почти втрое. Уже есть примеры компаний с тысячами клиентов, где большую часть операционной работы выполняют нейросотрудники: отвечают на письма, пишут код, обрабатывают обращения и возвраты. 🚩Для росс…

👍3💯2🔥2

16 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTC560 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

65% обращений клиентов Сбербанка уже обрабатывает ИИ. Не в лаборатории — в крупнейшем банке страны, 110+ млн клиентов. В 95% случаев ответ — мгновенно. Это перекликается со словами Йошуа Бенджио: в ближайшее десятилетие многие офисные задачи будут автоматизированы. Но дело не в замене людей. Работа делится на две части: выполнение задач и принятие решений. ❗️ИИ забирает первое — ответить клиенту, найти информацию,…

👍5💯5🔥4

29 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC700 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока одни обсуждают, «заменит ли ИИ людей», другие уже пересобирают свои бизнес-модели под новую реальность. ✅Разобрала интервью с Мо Гавдатом — бывшим топ-менеджером Google X. Он описывает ближайшие 10–12 лет как период сильной турбулентности. Не в эмоциональном смысле, а в структурном: ИИ постепенно забирает на себя всё больше интеллектуальной работы — от рутины до сложной аналитики и решений. И привычная модел…

🔥7👍5👏3❤1

13 Apr 2026, 10:23 UTC292 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С небольшим опозданием, 12 апреля - день который изменил траекторию человечества. Мы впервые поняли: Земля — это стартовая площадка, а не предел. С этого момента путь стал бесконечным♾ С Днём космонавтики 🚀

🙏5🔥3💯2

30 Mar 2026, 08:06 UTC701 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Если завтра соцсети “лягут”, где у вас останется аудитория?

  1. 📧 В email-рассылке14%
  2. 💬 В Telegram37%
  3. 😬 Нигде, всё было в соцсетях25%
  4. 🚀 Я уже дублирую аудиторию на всех платформах25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Mar 2026, 08:05 UTC590 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой канал вы считаете самым надёжным для общения с аудиторией и клиентами?

  1. 📧 Email — база всегда со мной16%
  2. 📱 Telegram — пока работает, пользуемся58%
  3. 🌐 Соцсети (Instagram / TikTok / др.)2%
  4. 🤔 Не думал(а) об этом, но теперь задумался(ась)24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC597 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️Пока все спорят о Telegram, тихо оживает старый добрый email. И, кажется, он никуда не собирался уходить. На фоне последних событий вокруг Telegram в России резко выросло количество отправленных писем — в марте их стало на 36% больше, пишут «Ведомости». Люди и компании просто начали искать более стабильный способ оставаться на связи. На Западе к этому пришли раньше. Там уже несколько лет креаторы массово уходят в…

🔥5❤4👌2👍2

20 Mar 2026, 09:45 UTC627 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

20 марта — день весеннего равноденствия. Космический Новый год 🌍✨ Сегодня Земля проходит ту точку на своей орбите, когда Солнце освещает оба полушария почти одинаково, и день становится равен ночи. С этого момента свет начинает постепенно побеждать тьму — дни удлиняются, а природа словно делает первый глубокий вдох после зимы. Не случайно этот момент называют космическим новым годом 🌍✨ Это не условная дата в календ…

❤8🔥7🙏5

13 Mar 2026, 08:01 UTC587 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️Больше всех от ИИ могут пострадать те, кто усерднее всего строил карьеру Новое исследование команды Anthropic показывает довольно неожиданный эффект развития ИИ: больше всего могут пострадать не те, кто «плохо учился», а наоборот — самые образованные и успешные специалисты. Что сделали исследователи: они проанализировали 800 профессий и сравнили их рабочие задачи с тем, как люди уже используют ИИ-ассистента Claud…

👍9🔥6👀5😨2

1 Mar 2026, 12:48 UTC591 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌍 Мир снаружи всегда будет нестабилен. Но мир внутри — это то, что вы можете строить прямо сейчас. Вы чувствуете, как внутри всё напряжено? Мысли скачут. Страхи давят. Кажется, что каждый шаг — риск. И правда: настоящая тревога рождается внутри. В мире сейчас много напряжённых сигналов😢 📖 Война с самим собой Карл Меннингер писал: «Мы все ведём войну с собой». Часто мы сами себе главный критик: боимся провала, гоня…

🔥12👍9🙏5❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @motivationbussiness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Mar 2026, 08:06 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

Если завтра соцсети “лягут”, где у вас останется аудитория?

  1. 📧 В email-рассылке14%
  2. 💬 В Telegram37%
  3. 😬 Нигде, всё было в соцсетях25%
  4. 🚀 Я уже дублирую аудиторию на всех платформах25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Mar 2026, 08:05 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

Какой канал вы считаете самым надёжным для общения с аудиторией и клиентами?

  1. 📧 Email — база всегда со мной16%
  2. 📱 Telegram — пока работает, пользуемся58%
  3. 🌐 Соцсети (Instagram / TikTok / др.)2%
  4. 🤔 Не думал(а) об этом, но теперь задумался(ась)24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Feb 2026, 08:09 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

А вы как думаете? Кто для вас ваши сотрудники?

  1. Очевидно расходы16%
  2. Доходы67%
  3. Не определился (ась)18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jan 2026, 08:27 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

Вы бы инвестировали в стартап, который добавляет людям +10 лет активной жизни, или запустили бы такой самостоятельно?

  1. Запустил бы сам34%
  2. Инвестировал бы9%
  3. И то и другое11%
  4. Пока наблюдал бы — рынок сырой, но потенциал огромный.13%
  5. Только если есть доказательная база — без науки это просто маркетинг.17%
  6. Нет, я бы делал сервис вокруг долголетия, а не саму технологию.15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jan 2026, 08:53 UTCAnonymous Poll79 voters

Если бы не нужно было работать ради денег, вы бы…

  1. Делали то же самое29%
  2. Сменили направление18%
  3. Искали дело со смыслом29%
  4. Взяли паузу и подумали24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мотивация | Бизнес” (@motivationbussiness), 2,263 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/motivationbussiness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.