Photo, posted without a caption
👍10💯3😍1

Channel
@morvarid_psy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,463subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001007818321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @morvarid_psy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/morvarid_psy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 1,463 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 1,461 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 1,463 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,463 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 75 | 71.4% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 17.1% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10💯3😍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍14💯7😍1
تولید روشنفکر در کشوری که نمیتونه ثروت تولید کنه!!! @morvarid_psy
👍4💯1🔥1
خطاهای شناختی که باعث میشوند فکر کنیم حق با ماست: 📌۱. سوگیری تأیید — Confirmation Bias تمایل به جستجو و پذیرش اطلاعاتی که باورهای قبلی ما را تأیید میکند و باعث نادیده گرفتن شواهد مخالف میشود.مثلا شما فکر میکنید رژیم خاصی بهترین رژیم دنیاست؛ بعد فقط ویدئوها و مقالههایی را میبینید که همان را تأیید میکنند و مطالعات مخالف را نادیده میگیرید. 📌۲. اثر دانای کلِ پسینی — Hindsight Bias بعد از وقوع یک رویداد، فکر میک…
👍2💯1😍1
یعنی در مرور سالانه باید جشن بگیرید که چه چیزی در طول سال بهتر شده، نه اینکه فقط به چیزهایی که نرسیدید فکر کنید. @morvarid_psy
👍4
قسمت سوم(پایانی) روز ۲: هدفگذاری انواع هدف در سیستم رضایتمحور ۱. اهداف نتیجه (Outcome Goals) چیست: هدف نهایی که میخواهید به آن برسید مثال: • وزن ۷۰ کیلوگرم • درآمد ماهانه ۵۰ میلیون • خرید خانه مشکل: فقط به نتیجه نگاه میکنید، به فرآیند نه ۲. اهداف عملکردی (Performance Goals) چیست: استانداردهایی که باید رعایت کنید مثال: • روزانه ۱ ساعت ورزش • هر هفته ۱ کتاب • ماهانه ۲ میلیون پسانداز بهتر: مسیر را قابل اندازهگیری…
👍4💯1
ادامه دارد….
😍2
قسمت دوم… گام ۲: تفکیک لذت از رضایت چرا تفکیک مهم است؟ بسیاری از ما لذت و رضایت را با هم قاطی میکنیم. فکر میکنیم هر وقت احساس خوبی داریم، راضی هستیم. اما این دو کاملاً متفاوتاند. تکنیکهای تفکیک ۱. تست «اگر نبود» «اگر این کار لذت نداشت، باز هم انجام میدادم؟» مثال: • تماشای سریال: اگر لذت نداشت، باز هم ساعتها صرفش میکردم؟ → احتمالاً نه • کمک به دوست: اگر لذت نداشت، باز هم کمک میکردم؟ → احتمالاً بله ۲. تست «…
👍5💯3
ادامه دارد….
😍2
هدف زندگی خوشبختی نیست چرا لذتطلبی هدف را اشتباه میکند قسمت اول عبداله مروارید-متخصص روانشناسی سلامت مقدمه ما در فرهنگی بزرگ شدهایم که «خوشبختی» را به عنوان هدف نهایی زندگی معرفی میکند. تبلیغات، فیلمها، شبکههای اجتماعی و حتی والدین همه به ما میگویند: «خوش باش»، «لذت ببر»، «به دنبال شادی باش». اما این پیام، یکی از بزرگترین فریبهای روانشناختی تاریخ بشر است. تفاوت سه مفهوم: شادی، لذت و رضایت ۱. شادی و لذت (Hed…
👍10💯2
اثر دانينگ-كروگر @morvarid_psy
👍2
مثل اینکه یک نفر دیگر هستید و دارید این رابطه/همسر را ارزیابی میکنید. چگونه انجام دهیم؟ ۱. تفکیک زمانی «اگه ۱۰ سال دیگه به این رابطه نگاه کنم، چی میبینم؟» ۲. تفکیک مکانی «اگه یک دوست از بیرون به این رابطه نگاه کنه، چی میبینه؟» ۳. تفکیک نقش «اگه من مشاور ازدواج بودم، چه پیشنهادی میدادم؟» ۴. تفکیک مالکیت «اگه این رابطه مال من نبود و داشتم ارزیابی میکردم، چه امتیازی میدادم؟» مثال عملی موقعیت: همسرم را عادی میبینم…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @morvarid_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 581,660 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خودآگاهي” (@morvarid_psy), 1,463 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morvarid_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.