Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Modelos

Channel

Modelos

@modelos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,892subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001230703031
TypeChannel
Username@modelos
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/modelos

Growth

1,8911,9151,9036 August 2026 — 1,912 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,912 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,910 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,891 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,892 subscribers1,8926 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,887–1,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 08:181,892+1
2 Sept 2026, 07:361,891-3
30 Aug 2026, 06:471,894-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:341,895-4
20 Aug 2026, 18:571,899-10
17 Aug 2026, 10:381,909-6
13 Aug 2026, 11:381,915+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:381,914+4
7 Aug 2026, 22:391,910-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:151,912no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:041,912first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 October 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,227 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
64952.9%
🔥29724.2%
👍21617.6%
❤‍🔥423.42%
🌭100.815%
👀60.489%
🤪50.407%
🤯20.163%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,227 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2021 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2025, 01:05 UTC≈20,700 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Cuál te ha gustado más?

  1. 🔥 Elizabeth73%
  2. 🤌 Nicole27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27

15 Jul 2025, 01:03 UTC≈20,700 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Nicole (Brasil) Vea más en Instagram. Revisa bien! 👉 https://www.instagram.com/channel/AbbYxnbW4LtVaxKb/

36🔥12❤‍🔥9👍4🤪4

13 Jun 2025, 20:28 UTC≈21,300 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐ Diva (2B): Elizabeth 📸 Fotos: https://www.instagram.com/p/DK4r_pNsyIi/

39❤‍🔥17🔥16👍3🌭1

7 Jun 2025, 00:07 UTC≈20,200 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Giorgia: https://www.instagram.com/p/DKk_JTWz8kA/ 🔥

25❤‍🔥16🔥13👍5

3 Jun 2025, 22:09 UTC≈18,200 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ok. Aquí va una sensual y mañana mandamos una fashionista para que todos y todas tengan lo suyo jajaja.. Aquí podemos ver más divas https://diva.city/models

57🔥14🌭9👍4👀1

2 Jun 2025, 19:54 UTC≈15,600 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Que estilo prefieres para el grupo?

  1. Stela 🔥68%
  2. Alicia 🩵32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7🤪1

2 Jun 2025, 19:53 UTC≈14,800 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇻🇪 Alicia 👉 https://diva.city/g/IGMOD

25🤯2

30 May 2025, 02:41 UTC≈14,600 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

STELA Aquí puedes ver más fotos: https://diva.city/g/IGMOD

34🔥14👀5

26 May 2023, 09:04 UTC≈70,600 views162 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Vamos a publicar las fotos e Instagram de ella aquí @modelaje Será un solo día, entonces activa las notificaciones en Instagram 😌⏰

102👍38🔥22

21 May 2023, 02:55 UTC≈62,500 views162 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Sabrina: https://divacity.me/SABRINA1

🔥7956👍27

18 May 2023, 19:54 UTC≈55,700 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Que quieres? 👀

  1. Ser modelo tradicional16%
  2. Ser modelo sensual online $33%
  3. Ver modelos tradicionales15%
  4. Ver modelos sensuales (reales) $54%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26🔥12👍9

18 May 2023, 19:35 UTC≈52,800 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Perfil de la modelo https://divacity.me/Raphavgn

🔥5929👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @modelos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2025, 01:05 UTCAnonymous Poll532 voters

Cuál te ha gustado más?

  1. 🔥 Elizabeth73%
  2. 🤌 Nicole27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Jun 2025, 19:54 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

Que estilo prefieres para el grupo?

  1. Stela 🔥68%
  2. Alicia 🩵32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 May 2023, 19:54 UTCAnonymous Poll609 voters

Que quieres? 👀

  1. Ser modelo tradicional16%
  2. Ser modelo sensual online $33%
  3. Ver modelos tradicionales15%
  4. Ver modelos sensuales (reales) $54%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Oct 2021, 21:21 UTCAnonymous Poll2,970 voters approx.

Cual te ha gustado más?

  1. 🇻🇪 Valeria57%
  2. 🇺🇸 Briana43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Oct 2021, 19:21 UTCAnonymous Poll1,720 voters approx.

Cual te gustó más? ☝️

  1. 🇻🇪 Victoria57%
  2. 🇧🇷 Andressa43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2021 to 15 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Modelos” (@modelos), 1,892 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modelos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.