4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,691–3,710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:32
3,693
-3
9 Aug 2026, 02:01
3,696
-12
6 Aug 2026, 04:32
3,708
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48
3,708
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
238 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
81
34.0%
👍
50
21.0%
🔥
42
17.6%
😁
23
9.66%
😈
12
5.04%
👾
10
4.20%
🤩
8
3.36%
🌚
6
2.52%
👌
4
1.68%
😎
1
0.42%
🤬
1
0.42%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 5 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 18 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moba_fun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 April 2025 to 5 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 The game is on. No buy-in. All upside.
100 USDT in the pot.
50 slots.
Top 50% take the prize—no gatekeepers, just pure skill.
Top 7 ranked games this week count.
That’s your shot. Clutch up, stack wins, and claim your share.
No excuses. No waiting. Just you, your grind, and the leaderboard.
Let’s see who rises. GG.
👉 Enter the League |
👉 MOBA USDT League chat
TODAY is the day
🎮 FREE USDT League Beta - 100 USDT Reward Pool 💰
⚡ Competition Details:
🍻 First come first serve: 20 FREE slots for the USDT League Beta
💸 Prize Pool: 100 USDT total
🏆 Eligibility: Top 50% players only
⏰ Daily Reset: 7:00 AM UTC+3
🎯 Scoring: Best ranked game of the day counts
📊 How It Works:
Your highest-performing game (before 7AM UTC+3 reset) determines your ranking position.
Only the top half…
🍀 Treant Protector – a secret Greenpeace agent! 🍀
💊 Valve is clearly betting on ecology: +10% trees in 2 years (now there are 2357!), and a huge increase in water surface area, almost 3x with the 'Wandering Waters' update!
💀 Next update: Will any eco-unfriendly heroes be axed?
🍀 Treant Protector – тайный агент Гринпис!
💊 VALVE явно делает ставку на экологию: +10% деревьев за 2 года (теперь их 2357!), и огромное у…
😌 This Time It's DEFINITELY Coming Friday Night... Or Maybe We Just Grind Stars League?! 😼
😼 Is Valve about to drop the new Battle Pass on us? If we look at past release dates, there's a pretty clear trend: May is usually THE month!
Battle Pass 2016: May 16
Battle Pass 2017: May 4
Battle Pass 2018: May 8
Battle Pass 2019: May 7
Battle Pass 2020: May 25
Battle Pass 2022: September 1
😛 BUT, even if the Battle Pass …
😑 How Much Does a Turbo Match "Cost"? Unveiling Conduct Secrets! 😑
Many wonder: how to raise your conduct in your favorite Turbo mode? We have the exact numbers!
For each match played, you receive:
🥇1-3000 conduct: +25
🥈 3000-9000 conduct: +12
🥉 9000-12000 conduct: +7
What about commends and reports?
Commend from an ally: +15 conduct!
Successful report: from -10 to -20 (depending on the severity of the "crime")
…
🤟 We’re continuing to experiment with stars ⭐️ in Telegram and are preparing something completely new! 🤟
Very soon, we’ll be launching a web version that will let you enter the USDT pool and withdraw your winnings on the same day! 💸
⭐️ And now for some exciting news: all the stars you’ve earned before the web-app launch day will be returned to you — doubled! 💵
🤝 But that’s not all! Participants in the Star League …
🥺 Wrapping Up Our Token2049 Side Event 🥺
📈40+ people joined Dota2 pool and 100+ attended the event!
🔥 It was an absolute blast: the first-ever Dota2 post-conference chill out, earning TG Stars, and enjoying brand new eSportsFi narrative 🦞
😎 On top of that projects' founders proved their Dota2 Skills in an epic 5v5 Dota match with friends and event attendees. It was⏳40 minutes of historical battle (spoiler: founder…
👀 A new Baby Pudge skin just dropped in the Workshop!
🤫 They even wrote a whole story for it:
Once upon a time in the festering depths of the Dire, Pudge the Butcher harbored a secret dream—not of guts and gore, but of porcelain skin, fluttery lashes, and dainty dresses. Tired of the stench and the slaughter, he tossed aside his hook and began crafting the perfect doll-body from shattered tower shards, magical trin…
❤7👌4👍4🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @moba_fun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 757,496 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“moba.fun” (@moba_fun), 3,693 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moba_fun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.