Channel
@mitchhub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,075subscribers
-984 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002680243195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mitchhub |
| Description | Nothing is FA, sharing my trades and convicitions. https://t.me/idrawlineTG For business enquires Dm: https://t.me/idrawlined |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mitchhub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 12,075 | -118 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 12,193 | -148 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 12,341 | -257 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 12,598 | -49 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 12,647 | -124 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 12,771 | -59 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 12,830 | -95 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 12,925 | -125 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 13,050 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 13,059 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 13,059 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (26 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 101,540 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mitchhub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The best way to move is to position in good narratives sub 1M. This way you prevent downside for your portfolio. If needed, IF its a BIG narrative like marscoin etc its alright to topblast at higher prices.
I actually think Pump.fun is carrying Solana right now, and it’s not even close. It’s basically Pump.fun criming a coin + all the tweet plays happening there. I also think BNB is much less solved. Like I said before, I think CZ will eventually take it seriously. Same story with Robinhood. Robinhood has its app to spark crime. Binance has its app to spark crime. I think this cycle we’ll see more rotations than e…
I’ve always said this: I want to be known as one of the best TRADERS. But at the same time, I genuinely love giving calls, helping people become better traders, and building a group of killers around me. Doing all of that at the same time isn’t easy. It’s something I have to learn, adapt to, and get better at fast. This cycle, my main goal is simple: make the maximum amount of money I possibly can. And while do…
just seen this and it's insane alpenglow upgrade is probably going live around late september / early october it's a huge new protocol tek built by anza the core dev team behind sol, gonna be the biggest protocol change in sol history major change is gonna be finality on ur transactions so basically the moment ur tx can't be undone rn that sits around 12.8s, they're aiming for 150ms so 85x faster lmao means whe…
As long as you don't let tilt consume you and define who you are, you can always stay cockroach moding until you hit your big one. I mean, all it takes is one. Luck is a skill; you have to prepare yourself enough get in that lucky situation. We got some winning to catch up on. Does that mean you will never lose? NO RETARD, don't full port every single trade into ONE coin and expect to win EVERYTIME !
my goat?
this means nothing to you if you're not using pump app but if you are, then you get better fills, no mevs, more tokens, more solana
jupiter is the biggest aggregator by far. not just on solana, but also across all chains a month ago i pinged the pumpfun team and informed them that on average, you get 5-8% more tokens when you buy something on jupiter instead of the pump app same thing with the sells. you get 5-8% more solana when you sell on jup this was because pump natively routed through pump LPs only today, i was informed that buys above …
funny enough, he said i was "the goat himself" but i guess i'm washed now cause i called him out? hilarious
i actually do like the guy he just needs to clean his act, and do better all of this is criticism, no hate may we all win
i would also like to add that he ran the same exact play last month LMAO
BREAKING: one of the GREATEST traders of all time, "the big duve" claims he's better than me and asks for my shills this year x.com/jackduval/status/2084996522622746648 here we go cashcat: -35% (higher) marscoin: -90% mensa: 200k - 7m ansem: 70m - 440m uwu: be manifest: -65% kintara: 1m - 22m jotchua 3m - 14m triplet 1m - 25m probably forgot some stuff i never said i was a good trader btw, i am a HORRIBL…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @mitchhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mitch (idrawline)” (@mitchhub), 12,075 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mitchhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.