Channel
@miromath_ege
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,378subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001806014191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miromath_ege |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miromath_ege |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 1,378 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,380 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,382 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,383 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 1,389 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 1,391 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 1,390 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 1,390 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
146 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 60.3% | |
| 💘 | 21 | 14.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 8.90% | |
| 😘 | 8 | 5.48% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.42% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.37% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.685% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я невероятно счастлива быть преподавателем, потому что у меня такие трудолюбивые и благодарные ученики❤️ Я действительно очень много стараюсь для каждого из них, педантично готовлю материал, и получая такие сообщения я понимаю, что это все не зря Я рада читать в их сообщениях то, что я так тщательно пытаюсь донести не только про математику и экзамен, но и про отношение к труду и жизни. Ведь ЕГЭ это лишь одно из испы…
💘9❤7😁4🙈4😘2
МАШАААА, у меня 80 баллов!!!!!
❤4
Маша, я хочу сказать вам огромное спасибо за подготовку, эти 2 года с вами были замечательными, насыщенными и интересными, я обожала ваши уроки и всегда с огромным удовольствием на них ходила и очень их ждала) когда летом 10 класса я решила, что буду сдавать профиль, я думала смогу сдать баллов на 60-70, я даже не могла подумать, что благодаря вашей прекрасной подготовке, я смогу увидеть 80 баллов за математику, я оч…
❤6
Я В ШОКЕ😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
❤2
Маша , просто не передать слова как я Рада такому результату 😭😭💗💗💗 Всё благодаря Вам!! Я даже не рассчитывала на такой результат сначала 😨❤️ Все было не зря ❤️❤️ спасибо вам 🥰
❤1
Утро сегодня доброе🤍 Просыпаюсь от довольных сообщений учеников. День, ради которого мы вместе упорно работали 💪
❤2💘1
Добрый вечер, у меня 72 балла! Спасибо вам большое за все занятия и труд, ваш вклад в каждом балле, который я получила! Всем свои знакомым, которые будут в ближайшем бедующем будут сдавать экзамен, буду рекомендовать вас как лучшего преподавателя и наставника. Спасибо большое!💋
❤1💘1
Результаты по русскому приходят 😱 Делитесь, как сдали?
❤3💘3
Лучшие вузы России Рейтинговое агентство RAEX представило ежегодный рейтинг 100 лучших вузов России. Пятерка лидеров за последние три года не изменилась, лучшим остался Московский государственный университет им. Ломоносова, который удерживает эту позицию с 2012 года, когда рейтинг выпустили впервые.
❤11💘3💯1
Профильный ЕГЭ позади и можно перевоплотиться из серьезного преподавателя в молодую девушку, достать свои баночки и покривляться на камеру 🤣❤️ Это теперь мое любимое видео! Сколько в каждое сообщение вложено сил и труда только нам с учениками известно. Очень довольна своей работой, если честно, выложилась на все 100%, остальное уже было в руках ребят и составителей экзаменов Последние тоже не подвели, будем ждать р…
❤15💘4
После экзамена получать счастливые голосовые со словами: «Я уверена в каждом задании» 🔥 Можно выдохнуть! Отработали💪🏽
❤10🔥5
Спасибо вам большое! Если бы не вы, всего бы этого не было!❤️🩹Благодаря вам я уверена в своих результатах🤩 Ещё раз большущее вам спасибо❤️🔥
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miromath_ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 417,245 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“miromath для учеников | ЕГЭ | ОГЭ” (@miromath_ege), 1,378 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miromath_ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.