8 measurements spanning 17 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,460–1,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 17:08
1,476
+3
21 Aug 2026, 04:54
1,473
+3
17 Aug 2026, 20:37
1,470
+1
14 Aug 2026, 21:57
1,469
+5
11 Aug 2026, 08:53
1,464
+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:34
1,463
+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:16
1,462
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:08
1,462
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.9%
avg views ÷ 1,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
544
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.717%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
10,884
Reactions total
78
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
36
46.2%
🔥
12
15.4%
👏
10
12.8%
❤🔥
8
10.3%
👍
6
7.69%
🤬
6
7.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2026 자주평화실천단은 7일 오전 서울 광화문 미대사관 앞에서 투쟁 선포 기자회견을 열고 “이 땅은 미국의 전쟁기지가 아니다”라며 오는 15일까지 전국 각지에서 자주와 평화를 위한 활동을 벌이겠다고 밝혔다.
실천단에는 민주노총과 한국노총 통일선봉대를 비롯해 대학생 자주평화실천단과 통일대행진단, 전국농민회총연맹·전국여성농민회총연합 자주평화실천단, 민주노점상전국연합 평화원정대, 진보당 8.15실천단, 평화주권행동 평화너머, 민애청 등이 참여했다.
https://www.minplusnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=18191
우리말로 바꾸면 ‘검은 머리 미국인’, 줄여서 ‘흑발미인’이다. 2006년 7월 25일 미국 대사 버시바우에게 전화해 자신이 미국의 이익을 위해 “죽도록 싸우고 있다”(fighting like hell)고 말한 통상교섭본부장 김현종과 같은 인물들을 가리키는 말이다. 아예 국적을 미국으로 바꿔 한국을 공격하는 한국계 미국인들을 가리키는 말이기도 하다. 모스 탄, 영 김, 애니 챈, 그리고 미셸 스틸이 그들이다. 한국인의 얼굴과 이름과 언어로 한국의 주권을 흔들려는 자들이다.
https://www.minplusnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=18187
인공지능 기술은 도입·운영 방식에 따라 노동자 간 격차를 만들고 불평등을 심화할 수 있다. AI 기술은 노동자를 통제·배제하는 수단이 아니라 인간의 역량을 확장하는 도구가 되어야 한다.
인공지능 시대 6
1. AI 도입 사례
2. AI 도입으로 인한 영향
3. 일자리의 변화
4. AI 도입의 전제는 인간 중심성과 노동권 보호
https://www.minplusnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=18186
김여정 부장은 "조선민주주의인민공화국의 안전에 엄중한 위협으로 될 수 있는 일본의 군사적 진화 과정을 절대로 수수방관하지 않을 것"이라며 "조선민주주의인민공화국 무력과 군사지도부는 오늘날 일본의 변신에 따르는 분명한 군사적 선택안을 추가 설정하게 될 것이라는 점을 위임에 따라 밝힌다"고 강조했다.
[전문] 김여정 조선로동당 중앙위원회 부장 담화
https://www.minplusnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=18179
2022년 안보3문서가 반격능력 보유와 방위비 증액의 청사진이었다면, 이번 백서는 전쟁 수행을 위한 작전체계와 국가 시스템을 구축하는 단계로의 전환을 선언하고 있다.
https://www.minplusnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=18178
4일 오전, 한국대학생진보연합(대진연) 회원 8명이 경기도 평택시 오산 공군기지에 주둔하고 있는 미 7공군사령부에 항의방문했다.
https://www.minplusnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=18176
❤8👏5❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @minplus51. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“민플러스” (@minplus51), 1,476 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minplus51.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.