Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 服务全能版的咪咪👅

Channel

服务全能版的咪咪👅

@mimiggyl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,381subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004323375683
TypeChannel
Username@mimiggyl
Description用心上好每一课🥰
First recorded8 November 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/mimiggyl

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 06:222,381first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.1%
avg views ÷ 2,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.246%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held16 (23 September 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total6,198
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Videos
7
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4285.7%
👍48.16%
🔥36.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC918 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

我的嘴说话不甜,但是👄很会(95-98👅)

4 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,240 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

爱情经不起等待,叫我宝贝就现在😘

❤3

1 Nov 2026, 05:17 UTC≈1,940 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

深情是我唯一的执念😮‍💨

❤5

31 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,030 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @dgcjbg888

报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间:10:31 验证留名:次次朗 所在位置:南城 老师名称:#咪咪 @mitaoty 上课价格:400 妹子年龄:27 妹子容貌:8 妹子身材:9 服务态度:10 环境设备:7 自由评论:约好咪咪,进门透视黑丝低胸长裙,一把揽入怀中坐在沙发上,开始把玩大奶,老师很主动配合,隔着裤子抚摸牛子,起身共浴擦干身体,躺在床上开始背面服务一波,之后以跪姿配合老师毒龙,正舒服之际,只见老师躺着从我身体下方钻进来一口含住牛子嗦起来,这操作爽翻了…😌翻身正面服务,舔完一波又是一口含住牛子嗦起来,直吸的灵魂出窍了…之后用大雷夹住牛子乳交,眼神直勾勾的盯着你,爽的快颤抖起来了,几乎要出水…赶紧叫停缓一缓,按惯例翻身压住老师,舔一波大奶,揉捏把玩大奶手感极佳,随后舔食鲍鱼,咪咪老师的腰细跟臀部不停的扭动,用手按住我的头,我很配合舔的更加快速,老师说受不了了,弟弟早已硬邦邦,戴套开干,正面冲击一波,水声不断,大奶剧烈晃动起…

❤3👍1

8 Oct 2026, 09:28 UTC≈4,500 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @dgcjbg888

报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间:9.8 验证留名:秃顶少年 所在位置:南城 老师名称:#咪咪 @mitaoty 上课价格:400 妹子年龄:29 妹子容貌:8 妹子身材:8 服务态度:9 环境设备:7 自由评论:在老师的指导下,来到了房间,进去之后就是老师那雪白的大奶,老师穿着白色的胸罩,十分性感,看得我浴火焚烧,交完水费后,就开始把玩老师的大奶,名副其实的D罩杯大奶,又软又白,爱不释手,我洗完澡之后,就开始了服务,老师身穿黑色性感吊带,来到床上后,把奶子露出来,放在我的鸡吧上面,给我舔咪咪,老师一边用奶子包裹并摩擦我的鸡吧,一边用灵活的舌头舔我的咪咪,简直爽到飞起,然后老师开始给我口,直接将我的鸡吧全部吞了进去,舌头也不断地挑逗龟头,是真的快要把我吸干了,口了好一会,让我趴伏着,老师开始特色毒🐲,真👅毒🐲,而且还做的很专业,细节把控的很好,另有一番意境。被老师折腾了半天,该我发挥了,感觉老师比较敏感,亲她身体的的时候,老师一…

❤4

7 Oct 2026, 05:34 UTC≈3,940 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

有点东西,不止一点😝😝

❤4

6 Oct 2026, 07:07 UTC≈3,950 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

照片是唯一锁住时间的公式💕

❤1

5 Oct 2026, 06:07 UTC≈3,780 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

和大海有过一个约定💕💕

👍2

4 Oct 2026, 04:44 UTC≈3,910 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

幸福很简单,但性福需要点东西🐍

❤2

3 Oct 2026, 09:18 UTC≈4,160 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @dgcjbg888

报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间:10:3 验证留名:黑客 所在位置:南城 老师名称:#咪咪 @mitaoty 上课价格:400 妹子年龄:28 妹子容貌:人照8成 妹子身材:大胸,大屁股 服务态度:很好 环境设备:复式公寓 自由评论:国庆假期约老师上课,见到老师直接交出课费,就洗澡去了,在洗的过程也有调情挑逗,洗完回课室,先做AB面,舌头和波漫游全身,到舔鸡儿很是认真,慢慢的由慢到快一下又插到老师嘴巴喉咙底,技术真牛,伸手摸她小脸,她却伸出舌头舔我的手,玩着她的小嘴,我捧着她的脸,忍不住用力蛇,很配合,老师呼吸急促的样子,勾着我脖子,嗯嗯嗯的发出声,舌了一会感觉快着不住了,赶紧叫老师转身,给我毒龙,舌头忽软忽硬的热乎的真顶,我的菊花有点敏感,老师又拿来了小玩具一手刺激我菊花,头钻我下面吃我的鸡儿,双重刺激下差点想喷,老师立马又给69起来,用手电筒照这个逼,粉色逼 连屁眼都是粉的,老师身上皮肤是真好,舔得老师一颤一颤的,老师也忽快…

❤3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mimiggyl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“服务全能版的咪咪👅” (@mimiggyl), 2,381 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mimiggyl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.