Channel
@millix_ii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,002subscribers
+141 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001816032303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @millix_ii |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/millix_ii |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 1,002 | +172 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 830 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 839 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 837 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 846 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 852 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 861 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 861 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
243 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 29.6% | |
| 🍓 | 33 | 13.6% | |
| 💘 | 29 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5422748213834697597 | 19 | 7.82% | |
| 😍 | 18 | 7.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 6.58% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 6.17% | |
| 💅 | 9 | 3.70% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
сегодня снова читали (это наше новое нишевое любимое хобби 🤩) 🤩🤩сняла для вас видео 🤩🤩про сборы сумки!! как и обещала, оставляю всякие ссылочки 🍐сумка — али 🍐стикеры — вб
💅7🔥7❤6🍓5❤🔥4💘3
последние два дня я провела дома: раскрашивала картинки, гуляла по деревне, смотрела сериал по «преступлению и наказанию». оказывается, это очень помогает пробежаться по деталям, которые при чтении не заметила. август — самое время глубже проходить тексты для подготовки к олимпиадам и егэ по литературе(чем я и немножко занимаюсь)!! второе вы, кстати, можете делать в 100бальном репетиторе по моей реферальной ссылочке…
❤18💘9🔥8🍓6
и вчера снова читали с мариной!!
😍17🍓12custom 542274821383469759712❤7
несколько минут назад я закончила «театр» сомерсета моэма!! мне невероятно понравилась книга🙏🏻 моэм загрузил интересными мыслями про театр и про самоощущение актера в обществе, про конкуренцию, про старение и про любовь… на самом деле про всю театральную внутрянку было безумно увлекательно читать в том числе и потому, что я, отчасти, с ней знакома, но, думаю, это отличная книга, чтобы попробовать погрузиться в эту э…
❤19🔥12💘11🍓7
наконец-то увиделись с моей любимочкой, читали книжки, ходили в книжный и были в просвете!! почти закончила читать «театр», там много интересных и знакомых мне мыслей про искусство!! а еще сюжет и слог моэма хорошиеее… напишу подробный пост про книжку, когда дочитаю📚
❤22🥰15❤🔥12custom 54227482138346975977💘6🍓3🆒3💅2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @millix_ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“печенье сердечком” (@millix_ii), 1,002 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/millix_ii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.