联通小助手 @ZGltxzsbot 24 小时在线 1.5U 查询一次
Signed 七星

Channel
@mijingzy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,264subscribers
-193 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002227138136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @mijinggs @mijingzy |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mijingzy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 1,264 | -28 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 1,292 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 1,301 | -35 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 1,336 | -15 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:35 | 1,351 | -32 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 1,383 | -15 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 1,398 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 1,409 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 1,424 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 1,430 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 1,433 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 1,436 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 1,432 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 1,433 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 1,435 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 1,436 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,437 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 1,438 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,439 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 1,439 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
联通小助手 @ZGltxzsbot 24 小时在线 1.5U 查询一次
Signed 七星
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称:枷锁 骗子用户名:@jiasuo_TG 苹果直达链接:tg://user?id=7002939340 安卓直达链接:tg://openmessage?user_id=7002939340 其他联系方式:无 群组频道链接:无 被骗的总金额 :2U 说明被骗过程 :我问谁会支付宝看名字 这傻逼就私聊我了 让我转2u教 ,然后我说我这个银行卡可能看不了 他说只要有银行卡就能看名字,然后我就转了15元人民币,到最后墨迹白天他说他没招了看不了名字 让我自己换银行卡,我要是能换卡我说我这个银行卡好像弄不了干什么呢? 我白说了?让退一半也不退 一直口水 具体看截图吧脑残一个2u当喂狗了 公示人:@XiaoTian401
Signed 秘境担保 问界
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 骗子昵称:南伐 骗子账号:@xxswd917866 被骗的总金额:20u 骗子收款地址: 苹果直达链接:tg://user?id=6148644169 安卓直达链接:tg://openmessage?user_id=6148644169 说明被骗过程:广东神父 20u 公示人:@wuya234
Signed 秘境担保 问界
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称:穷逼蠢猪知心 骗子用户名: @zxykx666 此人新号: @zxykx6 苹果直达链接: tg://user?8219507091 此人新号苹果直达链接: tg://user?id=7588884438 安卓直达链接: tg://openmessage?user_id=8219507091 此人新号安卓直达链接: tg://openmessage?user_id=7588884438 其他联系方式: 群组频道链接: https://t.me/zxykx66666 被骗的总金额 : 16u 说明被骗过程 :穷逼一个,每天搁春江找画面装逼混眼熟,诈骗死不承认,结果可能这条穷逼不知道okpay有账单记录😂😂😂 公示人:他爷爷
Signed 秘境担保 问界
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @mijingzy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mijingzy named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秘境之眼” (@mijingzy), 1,264 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mijingzy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.