Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Messeg vidolar

Channel

Messeg vidolar

@mesagesvide0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,951subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699991403
TypeChannel
Username@mesagesvide0
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mesagesvide0

Growth

4,9514,9884,969.512 August 2026 — 4,988 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,986 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,951 subscribers12 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,945–4,994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:174,951-35
13 Aug 2026, 00:064,986-2
12 Aug 2026, 18:164,988first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 4,951 subscribers
Avg views / post
845
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,689
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
9m 24s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7858.2%
❤‍🔥2216.4%
🥰1611.9%
😍53.73%
🕊42.99%
😘42.99%
21.49%
🍓21.49%
10.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mesagesvide0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC269 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuPhoto

Kech bo'lsa bo'lsin, Tanlovingiz xato bo'lmasin. 🥰

3

23 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,420 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_Halolimku

Haq bo'lsam ham, talashib o'tirmadim. Ko'nglimni ogʻritganlarga javob qaytarmadim. Shunchaki "TINCHLIK KERAK" dedim-u, hammasini vaqtga va taqdirga topshirdim. Chunki ba'zi narsalarni tushuntirishdan ko'ra, indamay ketish osonroq🖤

5❤‍🔥5

7 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,180 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuVideo

Zaynab va Junayd ❤️ Men sevib ko'rayotgan film❤

6

1 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC≈2,560 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hijobiya1Video

🤍🥹

❤‍🔥2😍1

23 Jun 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,790 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuVoice message

Узинга жаннатни эслат.❤ Abdulloh domla 🫀

3❤‍🔥1

23 Jun 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,500 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuPhoto

ошиқ кишининг суҳбати, ишқсиз одамга балодир. Юнус Эмро 🎀

5

22 Jun 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,460 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hijobiya1Video

💗

❤‍🔥72😘2😍1

21 Jun 2026, 18:24 UTC≈2,070 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hijobiya1Video

😂♥️

3🍓2😍2🕊1

9 Jun 2026, 04:09 UTC≈2,330 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuVoice message

Allohim ❤

2🥰2😘2🕊1

9 Jun 2026, 04:09 UTC≈2,290 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuPhoto

إذا كنت مع الله فكل شيء معك Alloh bilan bo‘lsang, hamma narsa sen bilan bo‘ladi..

3🥰1

8 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC≈2,400 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuVoice message

Bir narsa yaxshilab bilib oling....😄💕

1

8 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC≈2,230 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Juft_HalolimkuPhoto

- Yashasam ishq aro men seni kutib Jannatga kirsaydim qoʻllaring tutib :)

🥰32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mesagesvide0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,130,994 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Messeg vidolar” (@mesagesvide0), 4,951 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mesagesvide0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.