Channel
@meowwithxacker
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,545subscribers
+3,285 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003935089540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meowwithxacker |
| Created | 7 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meowwithxacker |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 03:15 | 3,545 | +331 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 3,214 | +26 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 3,188 | +136 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 3,052 | -167 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 3,219 | -97 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 3,316 | +22 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 3,294 | -72 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:24 | 3,366 | -120 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 3,486 | -157 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 3,643 | -158 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 3,801 | -315 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 4,116 | -125 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 4,241 | +776 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 3,465 | +3,176 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 289 | +29 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 260 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 260 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
112 reactions across 2 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5420597856853600340 | 43 | 38.4% | |
| custom 5415641052277156667 | 27 | 24.1% | |
| custom 5420091510274174573 | 18 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5408944184650408178 | 10 | 8.93% | |
| custom 5454065977190818806 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| custom 5411567967286636137 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5453947277179656509 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5452011282016281922 | 1 | 0.893% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
100 звездочек бесплатно итоги очень скоро ૮ ྀིᴗ͈ . ᴗ͈ ྀིა ᙆᙆᙆ
custom 542059785685360034043custom 541564105227715666727custom 542009151027417457318custom 54539472771796565092custom 54540659771908188062custom 54089441846504081781custom 54520112820162819221
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
໒꒰ྀི ˶• ༝ •˶ ྀི১ | info post owner: etopahan.t.me admin: kissyzone.t.me . ᵎᵎ
custom 54089441846504081789custom 54115679672866361375custom 54540659771908188064
Signed >.<
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @meowwithxacker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хакер” (@meowwithxacker), 3,545 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meowwithxacker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.