Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 22 MEDICOSSQUAD

Channel

22 MEDICOSSQUAD

@medicossquad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,190subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002083560384
TypeChannel
Username@medicossquad
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/medicossquad

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,1886,1996,193.59 September 2026 — 6,189 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,189 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,188 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,198 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,197 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,199 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,192 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,193 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,190 subscribers6,1909 September 202622 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,186–6,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 14:366,190-3
19 Oct 2026, 02:466,193+1
12 Oct 2026, 13:166,192-7
5 Oct 2026, 10:146,199+2
27 Sept 2026, 03:576,197-1
15 Sept 2026, 03:596,198+10
11 Sept 2026, 15:386,188-1
9 Sept 2026, 11:226,189no change
9 Sept 2026, 10:476,189first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6844.2%
😢1711.0%
💯159.74%
🤔149.09%
👌127.79%
👏95.84%
👀42.60%
🫡42.60%
✍31.95%
❤‍🔥31.95%
🙏31.95%
🆒10.649%
💊10.649%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈2,560 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DV6f928geZ1/?igsi=bHliajUydmp3dTZv 👆🏻NTRUHS FINAL YEAR all previous years Question Papers 👆🏻

❤1

23 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈5,110 views16 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😢9✍3❤3💊1

23 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈4,750 views9 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

2k25 Batch Anatomy 02 Reasoning questions Telsa veti answers meku ???

🤔5❤4

20 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈5,270 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Today Anatomy 01 Analysis from our Kaustuba series (Rapid series) Please share with 2k25 batch First year Juniors

❤2

20 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈4,220 views14 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @Medicossquad25Photo

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Analysis of today's Paper with KAUSTUBHA ANAT01 💎2k25 Batch Anatomy 01 held on August 20💎 1) Thyroid ✅ 2) Radial Nerve ✅ 3) Hyaline Histology ✅ 4) Extra Ocular Muscles ✅ 5) AETCOM ( Adhi own talent ) 6) INTERNAL CAPSULE ✅ 7) Scapula ✅ 8) Blood Supply to Long Bone ✅ 9) Placenta ✅ 10) Muscles of Mastication ✅ 11) Flexor Retinaculum ✅ 12) TS of Medulla ✅ We missed only AETCOM Question in KAU…

❤8👌5👏1

25 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC≈5,510 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026

https://youtu.be/J0rLWUYY7yI?si=aFqxzPqwlYcQWz7r

🫡4❤3🙏3

24 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC≈5,480 views34 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Everyone's opinion is respected I choose changing Vessel as it is fault.....few choose changing the feeding person I think Our questioning should be on the fault ....our protest should bring the permanent solution Me andariki baga telusu what I'm trying to convey ani this not about Vessel LEAK

❤30💯2👀1🤔1

24 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC≈5,360 views19 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Same feeding person Changed vessel 🥳 We no need to change him we have to change the vessel to prevent LEAK

👏8💯5❤4👀1🤔1

24 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC≈4,520 views5 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

This is not enough uncleeeeeeee change the vessel

💯5

24 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC≈4,230 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Something response we will get ......may be of no use

💯3

24 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC≈3,720 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Serious Questioning about the damaged vessel

❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @medicossquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

medicomama1.0
@medicomama1 · 29,398
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 9 September 2026
Physiology notes & mcq's mbbs 1 St year
@physiology_mbbs_notes · 23,487
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 18 September 2026
MED BOOKS 4.0 📚
@medicirclebooks4 · 19,144
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 October 2026
JOHARI MBBS LECTURES | YOUTUBE
@joharimbbsofficial · 181,446
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“22 MEDICOSSQUAD” (@medicossquad), 6,190 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicossquad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.