Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mobile Tech

Channel

Mobile Tech

@mdevnotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,361subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001830596614
TypeChannel
Username@mdevnotes
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mdevnotes

Growth

1,3471,3611,3547 August 2026 — 1,347 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,347 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,352 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,356 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,345–1,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 21:291,361+5
15 Aug 2026, 15:551,356+4
8 Aug 2026, 15:271,352+5
7 Aug 2026, 22:211,347no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:011,347first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.8%
avg views ÷ 1,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
637
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 February 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,911
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8035.4%
🔥5323.5%
😁3314.6%
👏229.73%
146.19%
62.65%
💯62.65%
❤‍🔥31.33%
🆒20.885%
🍾20.885%
💊20.885%
🤔20.885%
🤡10.442%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mdevnotes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC395 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

WILL BE TALKING AT FLUTTERCON THIS YEAR It will be about FFI, Build Hooks, Native Assets, and Rust!!! Who is going?

🔥13👍1👏1

3 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC842 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Listenables are now available in the new official package! https://pub.dev/packages/listen

👍122

28 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC674 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Why on earth would I install widgetbook when I can vibecode this in under 10 minutes? (It is also more performant and flexible) #flutterdev #flutter

👍10🤡1

18 Jun 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,140 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I recently visited a public hospital here in Krakow and was amazed by its size, quality, and cleanliness. As I was leaving, I saw a sign at the entrance showing the cost of the hospital: 1,200,000,000 zloty, equivalent to around $300,000,000. Meanwhile, investments in AI are estimated to total $3–5 trillion across the industry. Just imagine how much could have been built for the public good instead of investing in

👍83💊21

22 May 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,330 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Influenced by Pixer, my friend Yakov explored calling Haskell (it’s his deliberate choice 😅) from Dart 🎯 In his article, he explains how to do that and provides a few interesting benchmarks about when and when not to use FFI https://yakov.codes/articles/calling-haskell-from-flutter-for-fun-(and-some-profit)

👍73❤‍🔥2😁1

18 May 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,410 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Introducing Pixer, the fastest image library for Dart & Flutter. Resize, crop, transform, powered by Rust. 10-60x faster than the image package. https://lazebny.io/pixer-the-fastest-image-library-for-dart-flutter

🔥17👏10

Signed Michael Lazebny

1 Apr 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,650 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Introducing the reworked version of the Sizzle Starter! 🔥 For a long time, many doubted Flutter. I was one of its supporters, writing articles and giving talks about how this cross-platform UI and logic was the way to go. However, Liquid Glass changed everything for me. While it was possible to replicate native UIs in Flutter before, it just doesn't work that way now. When you try to create this amazing frozen-liqui

😁24👍6

Signed Michael Lazebny

24 Mar 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,240 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://lazebny.io/rich-text-localization-in-flutter/

👍93

Signed Michael Lazebny

21 Mar 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,240 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It feels I sent too little context about it 🙈 It allows to "create text nodes" and specify styles for them. I will write a small article on how to use this component with localizations 🤞🏿

👍11🔥3

Signed Michael Lazebny

19 Mar 2026, 19:28 UTC891 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Text component that supports inline styles

🔥3

Signed Michael Lazebny

17 Mar 2026, 19:38 UTC941 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Again build_runner performance improvements! https://x.com/__davidmorgan__/status/2033937829164699683?s=20

👍5

Signed Michael Lazebny

12 Mar 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,230 views16 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Soon Sizzle will have an entire design system implementation! I've been working on creating a Sizzle Design System, which contains foundations (colors, spacings) and core components.

🔥132❤‍🔥1

Signed Michael Lazebny

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mdevnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 265,332 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Developer's Home👨‍💻
@developperHome · 68,645
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mobile Tech” (@mdevnotes), 1,361 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdevnotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.