Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Максим Чернов

@maximchernov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,618subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001073353324
TypeChannel
Username@maximchernov
Created11 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maximchernov

Growth

6,6186,6296,623.55 August 2026 — 6,629 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,629 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,621 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,618 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,616–6,631 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:336,618-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:036,621-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:346,627-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:196,629no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:266,629first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9048.9%
7440.2%
🐳2010.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,350 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я вернулся. https://youtu.be/eSADvma2eHA?si=QyZq_VvCNHnamQvh

10🔥5🐳3

18 Dec 2025, 10:32 UTC≈2,120 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Написал тут постик (на английском) о том, как чуть не зафакапил съемку с миллиардером 🫠 читайте

🔥85

14 Nov 2025, 03:10 UTC≈2,410 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Для тех, кто угорает по ютуб-аналитике – я тут большой детальный текст выложил со всеми цифрами и фактами (включая $) про ролик, который упоминал выше. Заходите почитать в мой англоязычный тг канал: https://t.me/friendsofmax/101

🔥8🐳21

27 Oct 2025, 06:28 UTC≈2,280 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

вот этот видос который выпустили 4 дня назад супер плохо сначала пошел (посмотрели его уже? там русская озвучка есть) решил поделиться, что с этим роликом происходит (вообще не как мы ожидали) через недельку в том же тг канале поделюсь мыслями по стратегии на ютуб, которые кручу несколько дней. Про качество vs количество и как это поженить с нормальной бизнес-моделью ютуб-проекта. читайте тут (скрины из аналитики

🔥53🐳1

24 Oct 2025, 03:46 UTC≈1,760 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @friendsofmaxPhoto

We just posted a documentary from China where we show 18 of the most high-tech things there. I’m personally fascinated by what’s going on in China right now and it was very cool to spend almost a week in Shenzhen filming it. On top of that, this video was the most difficult, advanced, and time-consuming piece we’ve ever made. It started back in early August with research and brainstorming on what would be a very pop

9🐳2🔥1

24 Oct 2025, 03:46 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 12 August 2026

русский в настройках ролика тоже можно включить)

17 Aug 2025, 16:13 UTC≈2,360 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Помните я когда-то давно темой нетворкинга плотно занимался? 😁 Так вот, сходил тут вчера на ютуберскую конфу в Бангкоке и вечером отрефлексировал свои мысли о том как знакомился там. Рассказал в новом тг-канале тут (осторожно, на-английском!): https://t.me/friendsofmax/69 …

🔥84🐳2

30 Jul 2025, 11:39 UTC≈2,630 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У нас тут неожиданно YouTube ролик прострелил про Гонконг. Показал это здесь: https://t.me/friendsofmax/57 Ну и в целом я тут апдейты в новом канале делаю про то как развиваю ютуб и бизнес вокруг него. Сейчас два проекта новых придумали. Один еду реализовывать в Китай с сентябре. Другой пока секрет. Но в новом канале скоро расскажу! Если по-английски понимаете, то залетайте: @friendsofmax

🔥62

29 Jul 2025, 04:46 UTC≈2,040 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я тут апдейтов накидал по развитию нашего канала. Все правда на Английском. Если понимаете язык, то велкам - добавляйтесь: @friendsofmax Кстати ещё прикольная новость - галочку получили от ютуба! 🔥 ☑️

🔥124

8 Jul 2025, 08:24 UTC≈2,200 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Описал тут процесс найма персонального ассистента. Чекните кому интересно (инфа на английском): https://t.me/friendsofmax/41. НУ и подпишитесь на новый канал - давайте до 500 уже добьем, а то стыдно! 😅

8🐳4🔥3

24 Jun 2025, 14:19 UTC≈2,380 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

сегодня 2 часа с миллиардером общался (рублевым). он мне подказал, куда ютуб развивать. написал свои мысли по этому поводу. на английском правда. здесь чекните: @friendsofmax

🔥112

23 Jun 2025, 04:26 UTC≈2,310 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

если вы пропустили вакансию личного помошника (это потому что мы не добавились в мой новый тг канал @friendsofmax We’re Hiring: Personal / Business Assistant I’m on the hunt for a reliable personal & business assistant to help level up both my personal life and fast-growing YouTube content business. In just 3 years, our channel has grown to nearly 400K subscribers and 150+ million views — becoming one of Asia’s b

7🐳1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @maximchernov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 728,862 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максим Чернов” (@maximchernov), 6,618 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maximchernov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.