Channel
@matrixdock
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,921subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001867761808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @matrixdock |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/matrixdock |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 3,921 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 3,935 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 3,935 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
876 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 450 | 51.4% | |
| 🔥 | 229 | 26.1% | |
| 👍 | 171 | 19.5% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 1.37% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 1.14% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.342% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.114% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 876reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2023 to 12 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣Announcement 📣: We are excited to announce that Matrixdock integrates AI with existing RWA products $XAUm and $STBT, advancing RWA innovation in Asia 🪭 ❤️Read our story: https://www.matrixdock.com/blog/announcements/matrixdock-path-to-smarter-finance
🔥6👍2❤1
Trump rattles markets - volatility is likely to persist, and the quality of DeFi collateral is more important than ever. 🎯XAUm—the only gold-backed token integrated into DeFi. In the last 24 hours, DeFi liquidations spiked to over $310M, the highest since August 2023. ETH led with $181M, followed by wBTC at $49.2M. For those affected, the choice is clear: add more collateral or face liquidation at a loss. Purely c…
👍22🙏10❤7
Gold price broke $2800, is $3000 the next price target? Find out about how XAUm as high quality collateral for DeFi borrowing / lending here https://open.substack.com/pub/matrixdock/p/matrixdock-gold-xaum-as-blue-chip?r=4rq7ik&utm_medium=ios
🔥38❤23🖕3
https://cointelegraph.com/news/wall-street-is-betting-on-30-t-rwa-tokenization
Photo, posted without a caption
❤242👍87🔥64👎9😁1
Did you know - $XAUm physical gold backed token is the only gold token can be collateralized in DeFi borrowing and lending? In fact, its LTV ratio on Curve Finance is 93% Follow https://x.com/matrixdock twitter account for more insights.
❤45👍9👎3
㊗️ Ring in the Year of Golden Snake ㊗️
❤88
Hi new friends👋: Strategies on “How to” complete Matrixdock’s tasks for a chance to win free gold tokens XAUm are on https://x.com/matrixdock Follow us for more insights on Gold on chain! 💗💗💗
🔥57👍10
🧧Celebrate the Year of Golden Snake with Matrixdock and @BNBCHAIN!🧧 👉Stay tuned for tonight's Campaign launch! Follow our X account https://x.com/matrixdock for more updates 🚀🚀 We're giving away $20K worth of $XAUm—gold tokens backed by real gold—at the BNB Chain Red Envelope Carnival! ✅ You can participate in the Task To Earn Campaign through simple tasks with $XAUm on @PancakeSwap and @kinzafinance. Earn points …
🔥64❤14👍14
Channel name was changed to «Matrixdock Official»
Hi everyone! If you are interested to explore RWA space, BNB chain is hosting a AMM tonight 9pm SG time. please join the discussion https://t.me/bnbchain/4132
❤29👍14
🔥Matrixdock Partners with Brink’s for Global RWA Custody, Starting with Gold 🔥 🎯 XAUm - Gold-Backed ERC-20 token fully backed by physical gold, offers investors a trusted and transparent digital asset tied to London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) accredited gold. Brink’s will securely hold XAUm’s gold reserves in high-security, fully insured vaults, enhancing security and trust for global investors, especially i…
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @matrixdock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 899,395 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Matrixdock Official” (@matrixdock), 3,921 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matrixdock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.