Stop unsubscribing mfers. Good times will come back... eventually. We will cook again 👨🍳 P.S. If you unsubscribe youre gay.
😁21❤14😎4😱1

Channel
@mangocooks
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,433subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002229858633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mangocooks |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mangocooks |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 1,433 | -7 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 1,440 | -9 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 1,449 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 1,454 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 1,460 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 1,465 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 1,469 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 1,475 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 1,478 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 1,481 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 1,482 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,486 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 1,489 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 1,491 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 1,492 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 1,492 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
351 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 161 | 45.9% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 12.0% | |
| 😎 | 42 | 12.0% | |
| 🫡 | 22 | 6.27% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 5.41% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.285% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 21 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Stop unsubscribing mfers. Good times will come back... eventually. We will cook again 👨🍳 P.S. If you unsubscribe youre gay.
😁21❤14😎4😱1
I'm a lurker now. For now. 🧑🍳 https://x.com/mangoxbt/status/1900990040278212880
❤11😁5🔥2
Little update... Not forcing anything. Chilling. Will post alpha when I get some. 👨🍳 https://x.com/mangoxbt/status/1894947635531743475
❤8🔥3😎3
Keep sitting on those hands fam. Good days and opportunities will come. Dont force it. https://x.com/mangoxbt/status/1894189242554724530
❤13😎6🔥5
I'm getting smoked on this. Went from being up 200%+ to down 70% in the past few hours. Going to hold and see if the dev (who has a good track record) can turn momentum around n the next few hours. If it dips under $50k I will probably exit unless there is a high uptick in volume. Hoping this gets resurrected, let's see.
❤7🫡3😎3😁2
I aped my first bag in a few days last night... woke up.. up...! An alpha group told me to buy $franku Same dev as Moutai which hit $90m so the team must know what they are doing. The team's pinned tweet says: "We pay homage to the one true father of internet autism: Filthy Frank, the prophet of degeneracy, the master of shitposting, and the architect of Filth." They have been holding regular Spaces so they clea…
❤7🔥6😎4
My prediction is coming true- just faster than I expected... https://x.com/mangoxbt/status/1892636083487211791
🔥9❤7👏5😎1
I posted this tweet a week ago and I stand by it. It's happening quicker than I thought but yes the "meme super cycle" was a term made up by the same KOLs that have been farming us for the past year. The good news is that this whole Libra-Hayden episode is cleaning up the space super fast. Especially once some arrests happen. So although the bottom is not in yet it won't be too far away. I think we will see an up…
❤12👏6🔥4
Deleted that last call. Saw some things I didn't like on the chart quickly after I called so deleted to prevent anyone else buying. Market is terrible but that token just died in volume shortly after I called it. Lots of people are upset about that one,but best to take a quick L and onto the next. The search for a good BSC pump continues. If you see anything you like lmk in the comments and I'll take a look.
❤6🔥4😁3👏1
Sol will get worse before it gets better imo. But I do believe it will get better and it won't take too long. But this Hayden-Libre rabbit hole goes deep. With many bad KOLs and industry leaders implicated. I stabled almost all my Sol at $190 when this started to unravel. I'll start buying back when I see some resolve. BTC is still holding $96k - the overall crypto market is not toooo bad... I'm going to play wi…
❤7😎4🔥2🫡2
Market is terrible. I'm in $jailhayden as a pure narrative play. This guy is all over CT and I think the uproar and attention will stay here for another day or two. I'm still holding some $microwave- but given the market weakness I reduced my position. A lot of liquidity has flowed to BNB so I'm hunting for plays over there. I'll share anything I think is worth a gamble. Be patient, better days will return.
❤10😎4🫡3
The creator of the microwave filter on TikTok just shared these stats with the microwave community. For me the low volume + price stability of the token means holders are bullish and traders are out. Community is forming. And the growth on TikTok is proven with this data. I increased my position earlier today. Sunday is a quiet day- if the trend continues this could pop soon. Let's see. -- $microwave F8HJqR…
❤6😎3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mangocooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mango Cooks” (@mangocooks), 1,433 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mangocooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.