Вам как? Занимались бы таким?
- Да, интересно !56%
- Нет, точно нет45%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏10

Channel
@malyshkkkkaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Declared links · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
2,085subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001818547622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @malyshkkkkaa |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/malyshkkkkaa |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 2,085 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 2,086 | -11 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 2,097 | -7 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 2,104 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 2,105 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 2,107 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 2,110 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 2,112 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 2,115 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 2,116 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 2,117 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 2,118 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 2,123 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 2,127 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 2,126 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 2,127 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
143 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 42.7% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 21.0% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 11.2% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 8.39% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 6.99% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 4.90% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 2.10% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.699% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вам как? Занимались бы таким?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏10
Что я могу сказать по работе няней для собак... Из плюсов: 🐚не нужны навыки, откликнулся и сразу пошел работать 🐚безумно милая работа 🐚полезно для здоровья )) я находила сегодня 15 тысяч шагов Минусы: 🐚страшновато в плане ответственности, чтобы с собакой ничего не случилось 🐚физически устаешь, а это я одного выгуливала, а не сразу 5 )) Ну и по оплате мне скинули 1000 рублей за 2-3 часа 💸💸💸 Если эти деньги только …
❤9
по-моему я идеальная собачья мама ))
🥰12
Мне пришел положительный ответ от моей подруги 😉 И вот список того, что нужно было сделать: 🐚выгулять 🐚помыть 🐚покормить 🐚посидеть, пока хозяева не вернутся
❤7
Как же прошел мой день в роли няни для собак 😎 Во-первых, я поискала на просторах интернета и выяснила, что в среднем за выгул можно получить 500-700 рублей Но я решила не рисковать и начала спрашивать своих знакомых и друзей, у которых есть собаки, могу ли я сними посидеть 🐶
❤7
Всем привет! Итак, в инсте (кто за мной там следит), у нас уже 2ой день челленджа, где я выбираю себе профессию 🌟 Я выбрала для себя самые доступные и интересные для меня варианты: 1️⃣НЯНЯ ДЛЯ СОБАК 2️⃣UGC-креатор Остальные варианты пока держу в секрете, следите за сторис или моим телеграм каналом 🤫
❤10
Video message, posted without a caption
👍15👏4🔥3👌1😘1
Отвечаю один раз ⤵️
👍8🥱3😁2
У меня кстати уже тут появились хейтеры ) Мне пишут, почему мой папа не может мне купить машину, и вообще у него много денег, и он может обеспечивать меня постоянно.. 🪞
❤8👏2🥴2😁2
угадайте что я выбрала!
❤8😁3
Нужно что-то такое, чтобы: 🔴я могла совместить с сессией, которая уже на этой неделе 🔴творческое 🔴не надо долго разбираться или что-то покупать для старта 🔴учитывает мои навыки, с которыми я работаю в журнале В инсте мне уже накидали варианты, которые я могу попробовать. 🤫
👍7
На этой неделе я буду пробовать себя в 3-х разных профессиях. Не переключайтесь ❤️ PS: это будет весело
🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @malyshkkkkaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам как? Занимались бы таким?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 4 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Ksenia Malafeeva |
|---|---|
| YouTube | UC5XT42g3292ZuuSMJh-LKvQ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MALYSHKA/Ксения Малафеева” (@malyshkkkkaa), 2,085 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malyshkkkkaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.