Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гастроэксперт Макушина Анастасия

Channel

Гастроэксперт Макушина Анастасия

@makushinagastro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,237subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002202790920
TypeChannel
Username@makushinagastro
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/makushinagastro

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1901,2371,213.57 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,216 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,213 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,218 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,222 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,225 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,234 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,237 subscribers7 August 20265 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 59 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,183–1,244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 19:211,237+3
28 Sept 2026, 03:551,234+9
18 Sept 2026, 07:391,225+3
10 Sept 2026, 13:221,222+4
5 Sept 2026, 11:561,218+5
1 Sept 2026, 19:061,213-3
29 Aug 2026, 20:091,216+24
26 Aug 2026, 20:231,192+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:491,191-1
20 Aug 2026, 05:251,192+1
14 Aug 2026, 04:071,191+1
11 Aug 2026, 03:121,190-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:421,192-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,193no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:081,193first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

671 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27941.6%
🔥24035.8%
👍598.79%
😁243.58%
👏162.38%
💊162.38%
🤣91.34%
🍾60.894%
😢40.596%
🙏40.596%
✍30.447%
❤‍🔥30.447%
🫡30.447%
custom 520220285436586546720.298%
💯10.149%
🙈10.149%
🤩10.149%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 671 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @makushinagastro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC242 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Один из самых эффективных и доступных инструментов при вздутии живота - диафрагмальное дыхание. Не важно, чем вызвано вздутие: органической причиной (СИБР, целиакия, спаечная болезнь и т.д.), погрешностями в питании и сидячим образом жизни или гиперчувствительным кишечником при функциональном вздутии и вздутии на фоне синдрома раздражённого кишечника. ДД (диафрагмальное дыхание, а не Денис Дмитриевич. Хотя Денис Дм…

🔥8❤7🫡3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC308 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот, собственно говоря, модная альтернатива традиционной ступеньке-подставке для унитаза. Спасибо подписчикам и трендам из тиктока. Рубрика #намнадо и #дочегодошелпрогресс

🔥14🤣8❤3😁1

4 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC660 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Поза орла запор победит. Помним базу: Очень рабочий инструмент, который часто игнорируют/недооценивают. Особенно в случаях, когда присутствует чувство неполного опорожнения. Картинка не эстетичная, но наглядная 🫱🏻‍🫲🏼 Ставим 🔥, если успешно пользуетесь 🥲, если в первый раз слышите об этом достижении науки и техники В комментариях приложила пример ступеньки для создания правильного угла Гастроэнтеролог Анастасия …

🔥15❤3❤‍🔥1🤩1

3 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC374 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ощущение, что анализ кала на дисбактериоз - базовый минимум, а дыхательный тест на синдром избыточного бактериального роста с адекватной подготовкой - роскошный максимум. Вот мне интересно, в других специальностях, какие вредительства существуют? Не пейте статины, откажет печень? Не прививайтесь, а то начнется аутоиммунное заболевание? Гадание по общему анализу мочи? Антидепрессанты превращают в овощ? Я и без анти…

❤8😁6🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC340 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пациентка год ходила по врачам: по классике - анализы кала на дисбактериоз (вы вся в паразитах), диффузные изменения поджелудочной (у вас панкреатит), перегиб желчного пузыря (скоро будут камни). Зашла ко мне человеком с кучей диагнозов, вышла здоровой. Никакой гениальности с моей стороны не потребовалось, базовые знания гастроэнтерологии, полученные в ординатуре. И все было бы чудесно, если бы превентивщик не назн…

❤18🔥8😢4🙈1

31 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC435 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Причины низкой кислотности. В целом, низкая кислотность в нашей практике - нечастый сценарий. Основное условие - почти полное отсутствие клеток, вырабатывающих кислоту в желудке, то есть должна присутствовать выраженная атрофия тела желудка (III-IV стадия по OLGA). При очаговой атрофии оставшиеся клетки компенсируют кислотопродукцию. Или, как вариант, отсутствие желудка. У нас на клиническом разборе однажды была…

❤10👍6custom 52022028543658654672

25 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC579 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

КАК ПРОВЕРИТЬ СВОЮ КИСЛОТНОСТЬ? Начну со списка «вредных советов», которые можно встретить на просторах интернета: Итак, наш список возглавляет - оценка кислотности по интенсивности отрыжки! Как: Сода натощак. Выпить раствор соды - и ждать отрыжки. Если отрыжка быстрая и мощная - «кислотность высокая». Если нет - «низкая». - В реальности отрыжка зависит от количества проглоченного воздуха, тонуса сфинктеров и ск…

🔥41❤5👍4

22 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC545 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Поговорим о кислотности?

  1. У меня пониженная кислотность.3%
  2. У меня повышенная кислотность.21%
  3. Не задавался этим вопросом. Хочу знать.48%
  4. Не задевался этим вопросом. Знать не хочу, хочу в отпуск и шашлык.31%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤3💊3🔥1🤣1

18 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC762 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Эта неделя у меня выдалась неделей запоров - причем несколько пациентов с одной и той же клинической картиной. Вздутие живота, длительная задержка стула. В анамнезе - эпизодический прием псиллиума. Псиллиум пробовали. Эффект был. Но препарат отменили, как только наступило улучшение. Итог возврат симптомов. По какой-то причине никто не объяснил, что псиллиум при хроническом запоре - это не симптоматическое средство…

❤14✍3👍3🔥2💊1

11 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,140 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Желчный. Разбираю три самых живучих заблуждения. То, о чем спрашивают постоянно. Миф первый. Перегиб желчного пузыря нужно лечить Нет. Перегиб - это вариант формы пузыря, а не болезнь. С ним рождаются, с ним живут, и сам по себе он не требует ни пожизненного приема желчегонных, ни курсового. Если нет симптомов - нет показаний к терапии. Желчегонные при бессимптомном перегибе - это лечение анализа, а не пациента. Ми…

❤18👏7👍3💊2🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC842 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Анастасия Алексеевна вернулась из длительного отпуска. Расписание везде открыто, в том числе дополнительные окна в выходные. Рабочий настрой максимальный 🫱🏻‍🫲🏼 Есть идея записывать более подробные, 20-ти минутные ролики по каждому интересному заболеванию/вопросу. Нам оно надо? Если надо - сделаем.

❤30👍12🔥11💊3❤‍🔥1

29 May 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,290 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

На завтра появилось два окошка в GMS. Весь июнь я буду в отпуске. Планирую уехать в санаторий желудочно-кишечного профиля, оставить телефон в Москве, соблюдать стол номер 5, сидеть в соляной пещере и жить свою лучшую жизнь. https://www.gmsclinic.ru/doctors/makushina-anastasiya-alekseevna?ysclid=mpr70h1ltk856167253#tab=articles

❤20🔥13👍3💊2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @makushinagastro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

Поговорим о кислотности?

  1. У меня пониженная кислотность.3%
  2. У меня повышенная кислотность.21%
  3. Не задавался этим вопросом. Хочу знать.48%
  4. Не задевался этим вопросом. Знать не хочу, хочу в отпуск и шашлык.31%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гастроэксперт Макушина Анастасия” (@makushinagastro), 1,237 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makushinagastro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.