Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Magician Call

@magiciancall

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,902subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001746056068
TypeChannel
Username@magiciancall
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/magiciancall

Growth

1,9021,9181,9107 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,900–1,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:481,902-7
10 Aug 2026, 19:211,909-6
8 Aug 2026, 00:421,915-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:001,918no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:491,918first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1184.6%
😭215.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC335 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

小猪快跑是由 Anome (币安alpha) 团队领投的AI策略量化平台, 目前产品已经落地运营, 由Ai策略支持的年化收益稳定,可持续性强。 Anome 官宣投资: https://x.com/anome_official/status/2074496038623174709?s=46 平台币$PIG即将上线,$PIG的应用场景包括: 1. AI策略提取盈利消耗 2.小游戏打金消耗 3.后续其他生态消耗 代币上线进度关注: https://t.me/PINGRUN_FUN 团队长合作对接: @PIGRUN_Joe9 @SuperNick0 社交媒体: 官网:https://pigrun.fun/ 官推:https://x.com/pigrun_fun 白皮书:https://pigrun.fun/whitepaper/ 小游戏:https://pigrun.fun/play/

15 Jun 2026, 12:28 UTC552 viewsread 7 August 2026

Told you so. 340k-840k Would be nice to catch the dip @ 200k. https://x.com/UPO_UFO/

15 Jun 2026, 05:55 UTC532 viewsread 7 August 2026

0xdf1e8518b18fe373c68d2d49360dde8277461111 Aped this, should moon

5 Feb 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2019281955255353650?s=46

2

3 Feb 2026, 05:12 UTC≈1,450 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

如果你有3分钟空闲时间,并且想体验史上最简单的空投,那就去 metawin.com 注册一个账号吧。 所有充值用户都能获得 $METAWIN 空投,创始人已确认空投将在本月进行。 如果你运气好,就能像这位老兄一样,把10美元变成16.3万美元。

1

30 Jan 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.8004scan.io/agents/ethereum/14645 https://x.com/StoryAIon8004

20 Jan 2026, 06:25 UTC921 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

MetaWin 的创始人 Skel 已确认 $METAWIN 将于本月上线。 如果您想获得空投,请确保您已注册 metawin.com 账户并已充值。 他们之前已向 NFT 社区赠送了超过 650 万美元的 NFT,所以这次的token值得关注。

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @magiciancall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Magician Call” (@magiciancall), 1,902 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magiciancall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.