Channel
@mad1_717
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,967subscribers
-234 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002687871823 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mad1_717 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mad1_717 |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
35.6 average views per post against 2,967 subscribers — an engagement rate of 1.20%. Across the 722 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,138 subscribers, posting mainly in Belarusian — the middle half sit between 18.9% and 56.1%, with a median of 34.6%.
| Window | 30 days (18 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 17 of 17 published in the window (17 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 606 |
| Mature posts only | 1.26% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 2,967 measured 17 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:bel · 722 channels · p10 8.54% · p25 18.9% · p50 34.6% · p75 56.1% · p90 88.5% |
| Position in cohort | 0.832th percentile · 1/29 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.097% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Belarusian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 17 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 2,967 | -233 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 3,200 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 3,201 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 606 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
24 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Биласанми, чироғим, ҳаётингда қабул қилган энг тўғри қароринг қандай бўлади? Ҳеч кимга, ҳеч нарсани исботламаслик. Ўзингни қандай инсон эканингни ҳеч кимга тушунтиришга, ҳеч кимни ишонтиришга мажбур эмассан. Сен бузмаган нарсангни тузатишга уринма. Қадрингни кўришни истамаган инсонлар учун курашма. Одамлар нимани хоҳласа, шу нарсага ишонади. Ортингдан нима хоҳласа, шуни гапиради. Бу — уларнинг муаммоси, сеники эма…
😘1
#Хайрли_тун 🌙"Мени ҳеч нарса ранжитолмайди" деб қарор қилингки, шунда ўзингизни ёмон ҳис қилмайсиз... Ўзингизни яхши ҳис қилар экансиз, сизни ҳеч ким ва ҳеч нарса ҳеч қачон ранжитолмайди! © Марк Аврелий 🌙Тунингиз осуда ўтсин, Қадрдонлар!
Мен «С» типидаги инсонман. Мен соат 6 да уйғонишим ҳам мумкин, 10 гача ухлаб қолишим ҳам. Мен хабарларга 10 секундда жавоб беришим мумкин, ёки уни уч кундан кейин эслашим ҳам мумкин. Мен давра марказида бўлишим мумкин, эртаси куни эса ҳеч ким билан гаплашгим келмаслиги мумкин. Мен соатлаб нима кўришни танлашим мумкин, охирида эса аввал кўрган нарсамни яна бир бор кўришим мумкин. Мен ярим кунни майда-чуйда ишларг…
❤1
хақиқий мухаббатда якун бўлмайди, араз, гина бўлиши мумкун, аммо қалб осонгина воз кечмайди..
Шундай инсонлар борки чироғим, улар йўқ вақтида ҳам борлигини қаттиқ ҳис қиласан.
Ba'zan hec kimga aytolmaydigan og'riqlar bo'ladi. Yigʻlaging keladi, lekin kimga? Aytsang tushunmaydi, jim tursang ichingni kuydiradi. Katta boʻlib anglab boryabman, ba'zi narsalarni shunchaki ichingda "dafn" etishing kerak ekan..
Bunga erishish uchun hozirdan har tomonlama harakat qilishim kerak, buni juda ham yaxshi bilaman. Har tomonlama ideal inson bolishim kerak: o'qishim, o'z ustimda ishlashim, kuchli inson bo'lishim, umidimni uzmasligim kerak - buni ham yaxshi bilaman. Alloh harakat qilganga va menga ishongan insonga beraman degan. Hozir qiyin hayot, qiyin davrdir, lekin bu hayotimizda bu kunlar davomiy degani emas. Ishonaman 5 yildan s…
👏1
5 yillikdan so'ng hayotim: - sevgan insonim va farzandlarim bilan oilam. - o'qimishli ona, o'qimishli rafiqa, o'qimishli farzand. - rayhon ekilgan kichkina dala, gullar bilan to'lgan tokchalar, men uchun atalgan, bolaligimda orzu qilgan bir burchakda piano, ovqat qilib yayrash uchun shinamgina oshxona, mushkambar hidi bilan qoplangan xonalar bilan fayzli uy. - "yaxshi rafiqa" , "yaxshi ona", "yaxshi kelin" kabi gapla…
Ва сен охирида сенга кун давомида катта гулдасталар ва бир талай совғалар жўнатадиган инсонни эмас , сен билан гаплашиш учун шахарнинг нариги четидан бўлса хам келадиган ва ичингдаги дардларни оладиган инсонни чиндан сева бошлайсан , ха сен ўша атига беш дақиқалик сухбатни бошқа барча нарсалардан кўра кўпроқ қадрлай бошлайсан
💘1😘1
File, posted without a caption
❤🔥2
Ўзингни эҳтиёт қил', деган жумланинг давоми; Чунки мен сени асрай олмадим', бўлиши керак.
❤1
Мен жуда адашган эканман. Ўйлардимки, одамларга мен билан қандай муомала қилиш кераклигини ва муҳаббат қандай кўринишга эга эканини, зарур бўлса юз марталаб тушунтириш керак. Ҳар сафар янги сўзлар, янги маънолар топардим. Қайта-қайта суҳбат бошлардим. Лекин кейин тушундим - баъзан шунчаки жим бўлиб кетиш керак экан. Одамлар ҳаммасини тушунишади. Улар қандай қилиш кераклигини яхши билади. Фақат қилишни исташмайди.
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mad1_717. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 994,895 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Madina’s blog” (@mad1_717), 2,967 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mad1_717.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.