Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Michelle Bunny πŸ”ž

Channel

Michelle Bunny πŸ”ž

@m_baezsan1

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

2,221subscribers

-133 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735877477
TypeChannel
Username@m_baezsan1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 24 January 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/m_baezsan1

Topic

Adult β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2212,3542,287.57 August 2026 β€” 2,354 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 2,354 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 2,343 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 2,334 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 2,327 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 2,320 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 2,313 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 2,309 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 2,303 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 2,300 subscribers7 September 2026 β€” 2,291 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 2,274 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 2,262 subscribers26 September 2026 β€” 2,249 subscribers5 October 2026 β€” 2,229 subscribers11 October 2026 β€” 2,221 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 65 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,201–2,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 21:202,221-8
5 Oct 2026, 07:212,229-20
26 Sept 2026, 23:192,249-13
15 Sept 2026, 09:202,262-12
11 Sept 2026, 19:392,274-17
7 Sept 2026, 14:012,291-9
2 Sept 2026, 09:342,300-3
30 Aug 2026, 04:282,303-6
27 Aug 2026, 06:452,309-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:062,313-7
20 Aug 2026, 12:482,320-7
17 Aug 2026, 18:382,327-7
14 Aug 2026, 19:132,334-9
11 Aug 2026, 14:312,343-11
8 Aug 2026, 16:032,354no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:032,354first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 24 January 2023 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

713 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯27738.8%
❀24734.6%
πŸ‘9313.0%
πŸ₯°608.42%
🍌182.52%
πŸ‘152.10%
πŸ‘Ž10.14%
πŸ’Š10.14%
😁10.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2023 to 19 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for Β· 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @m_baezsan1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2023 to 19 February 2023. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2023, 08:16 UTCβ‰ˆ99,700 views209 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”žCome in to fuckπŸ‘‡πŸΌ https://t.me/+cm14nr02tKM1MGRi 🟣 https://t.me/+cVuJ5suA4QMzYjcy 🟒

πŸ”₯103πŸ‘40❀39πŸ‘15πŸ₯°6🍌4πŸ‘Ž1πŸ’Š1

13 Feb 2023, 21:03 UTCβ‰ˆ89,400 views137 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ”₯79❀21πŸ‘16πŸ₯°14🍌7

8 Feb 2023, 19:29 UTCβ‰ˆ65,600 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”žCome in to fuckπŸ‘‡πŸΌ My loveπŸ’‹

❀56πŸ”₯24πŸ‘9πŸ₯°3

3 Feb 2023, 18:08 UTCβ‰ˆ57,300 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀56πŸ”₯13πŸ‘7🍌3πŸ₯°2

31 Jan 2023, 23:58 UTCβ‰ˆ47,300 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”žCome in to fuckπŸ‘‡πŸΌ My loveπŸ’‹

πŸ₯°35❀13πŸ‘12πŸ”₯5😁1

28 Jan 2023, 10:20 UTCβ‰ˆ46,000 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ”₯47❀16πŸ‘5

24 Jan 2023, 20:50 UTCβ‰ˆ38,800 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”žCome in to fuckπŸ‘‡πŸΌ My loveπŸ’‹

❀46πŸ”₯6🍌4πŸ‘4

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @m_baezsan1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions β€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œMichelle Bunny πŸ”žβ€ (@m_baezsan1), 2,221 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_baezsan1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.