Channel
@lunavrake
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,699subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001953046602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lunavrake |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lunavrake |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 3,699 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 3,705 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 3,710 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 3,713 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 3,715 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 3,720 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 3,721 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 3,724 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 3,724 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 5 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 85.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2025 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
делаю таро расклады, славлюсь своей эмпатией и проницательностью в кейсах: • выявила измену и по фото девушек определила с кем и когда • профессионально отличала тюбиков от масиков цена: 1200₽ расклада пишите напрямую: @yanasos «хочу таро расклад» успею только 5х человек 🙏🏻 два сегодня / три завтра
❤1
почему редко этим занимаюсь? у меня метод триплетов и использую сразу несколько колод под персональный запрос много энергии уходит на ту самую точность Отзывы: @yanatiko_ot
Причем самое интересное, если в конце месяца прогноз не отыграется у кого-то. Я прям жду, чтобы разбираться, где я допустила ошибку или может время не правильное, или обстоятельства другие может. Это же всегда исследование, но пока сбываются чему, конечно, рада 😁
❤9
Гляньте, как прикольно. В прогнозе у девушке отчетливо виднелись сдвиги в рабочих делах, но она сначала сказала ничего не намечается, а сегодня пишет (спустя неделю) повышении!
❤8
статистика
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
вопрос, вы бы хотели в прогноз знать, что может что-то случиться негативное по определенным сферам жизни? с одной стороны, если это есть, оно в любом случае каким-то образом может проиграться но взять меня я тревожник, я импульсивная, я паникерша скажи мне что все плохо, мне будет тяжело собраться и об этом не думать
❤17
вот еще отписались 🤎
❤🔥5🔥3
Я закончила сегодня тех девушек, возьму так же: Ищу 3 человека, кто готов получить астропрогноз на месяц в обмен на честную обратную связь ⠀ Что вы получите: ✔️ Прогноз событий, ключевых тем и энергетических периодов ✔️Подсказки: когда действовать, а когда лучше переждать ✔️Поддержка по личным вопросам: отношения, работа, финансы ✔️Возможность задать уточняющие вопросы ⠀ Стоймость: 1900₽ ⠀ Приступаю сегодня, если за…
❤8
Но с таким подходом понимаю, что выгорания я ловлю как раз таки от вовлечение. Стараешься быть сухим - теряется качество работы, хочешь зарабатывать более 200к - ничего не успеваешь, выгораешь, задерживаешь разборы. Понимаю, что нужно что-то менять.
❤4
Вот в случаи этой девушки. По-хорошему заканчивать все. Но ей было интересно, как пройдет год с этим человеком. Те кто со мной долго, приходили на разные услуги, ты как бы уже с ними проживаешь все события. У меня не получается не думать о людях и их судьбе.
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lunavrake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
статистика
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2025 to 13 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Астролог | Яна Титова” (@lunavrake), 3,699 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lunavrake.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.