Channel
@lowbank_team
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,637subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002046669447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lowbank_team |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lowbank_team |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 1,637 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,642 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 1,648 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,654 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 1,654 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
173 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 109 | 63.0% | |
| 👌 | 20 | 11.6% | |
| 🌚 | 18 | 10.4% | |
| 👾 | 11 | 6.36% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 5.20% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет, я вернулся 👋 Пока меня не было, AI не стоял на месте, крипта делала что умеет (падать), а я копил мысли и всё откладывал написать. Ну вы знаете как это бывает. Теперь всё, хватит откладывать. Буду писать про всё что реально интересно: AI инструменты которые сам использую, про крипту и лайфхаки для жизни. Как у вас дела? Чем сейчас занимаетесь? Пишите в комменты, хочу догнать👇
🔥10
Лоубанки тут? на связи? Проверка на актив
🌚13👌8👾1
🐧 В погоне за дропом от Pengu или Abstract Рынок довёл. Начал играть в игрушку от Pudgy Penguins. Может помните, в декабре 2024 раздавали дроп, который прилетел за MEME или Clusters - кому как. Их экосистема продолжает развиваться, вот, совсем недавно дропнули прикольную игру - Pudgy World. Суть её открывать локации, собирать ачивки, фармить ХР и тд. Кому как, а мне там понравилось скользить на пузе, ничего так не …
👾5👌2
🧐 Раздача 100.000$ от BingX BingX запустил новую акции, с которой можно заработать: собираем шарды (их новая внутренняя валюта статуса) и участвуем в раздаче. Ивент идёт до 2 декабря, так что времени достаточно, но лучше включиться сейчас - в начале всегда проще. Фрагменты капают за самую обычную активность: - прошёл KYC - сделал депозит или любую сделку - участвуешь в их акциях - позвал новичка Короче, как бы ты …
🔥3
Полгода не было, я тут, Blum разбудил. Вот чекер, что там у вас?
Проверяем дроп от PAWS Мы всё таки дождались, жду от вас скрины: https://paws.community/app?tab=claim Клейм уже не за горами, пока без точных дат.
👾5
Сегодня появилась простая активность без вложений - Waitlist от Legend. Просто переходим на сайт, заполняем все данные и ждём апдейтов. Если у вас есть ферма почт - смело загоняйте. В проект занесли 15М$ а16z & Coinbase, они куда попало не заносят. Есть большой шанс повторения истории с Arkham.
🔥11🌚1
Все парни, это конец Paws. Квестов больше не будет. Вам осталось только пройти финальный вериф на сайте и все. https://paws.community/ Следующий этап это дроп для всех, а не только для тех, кто имеет 300к+.
🔥15👌5
✨ закрыл в +20.86$ , сегодня кушаю там ещё лаву можно было зашортить , тоже под раздачу за ТС кто-то со мной залетал ?
🔥13🌚1
через 25 минут $SONIC будет делать выплаты за ТС на Bybit , можно аккуратно пошортить с небольшим плечом #dyor
🔥9
Кто гонял мост Orbiter Finance , проверьте себя на дроп https://www.orbiter.finance/en/airdrop?src_chain=1&tgt_chain=10&src_token=ETH
Заберите +1000 PAWS https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp
🔥7👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lowbank_team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,118,586 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lowbank_team named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lowbank team” (@lowbank_team), 1,637 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lowbank_team.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.