22 measurements spanning 30 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,217–10,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 12:39
10,226
-6
6 Sept 2026, 06:39
10,232
-1
3 Sept 2026, 22:37
10,233
-4
2 Sept 2026, 17:12
10,237
-7
1 Sept 2026, 14:53
10,244
-2
31 Aug 2026, 11:17
10,246
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:35
10,250
-4
28 Aug 2026, 11:04
10,254
+1
26 Aug 2026, 08:11
10,253
+5
25 Aug 2026, 08:32
10,248
-3
24 Aug 2026, 08:47
10,251
-2
22 Aug 2026, 14:23
10,253
-7
21 Aug 2026, 04:55
10,260
-2
20 Aug 2026, 06:08
10,262
-8
19 Aug 2026, 08:43
10,270
-3
17 Aug 2026, 09:55
10,273
-5
15 Aug 2026, 15:26
10,278
+3
14 Aug 2026, 06:19
10,275
-7
12 Aug 2026, 22:18
10,282
-4
11 Aug 2026, 19:42
10,286
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,191 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,514
47.4%
❤🔥
363
11.4%
🔥
267
8.37%
😍
260
8.15%
💋
159
4.98%
🤩
150
4.70%
🥰
148
4.64%
💔
142
4.45%
💘
63
1.97%
⚡
49
1.54%
🍾
28
0.877%
🍓
19
0.595%
💅
11
0.345%
😈
6
0.188%
🦄
4
0.125%
🎉
3
0.094%
👻
2
0.063%
🤗
2
0.063%
🍌
1
0.031%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,191 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lorenhalefucksbetter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 17 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Книги «Магнолия Паркс» и «Дэйзи Хэйтс» можно читать параллельно 😏
И это лучший способ прочувствовать всю драму этой серии 🌟 События в книгах происходят в одно время, поэтому с этим графиком ты будешь видеть историю сразу с двух сторон 💗
❌ 🐅 ГОТОВЫЙ ПЕРЕВОД 🐅
КНИГА: Дэйзи Хэйтс
АВТОР: Джесса Хэйстингс
СЕРИЯ: Магнолия Паркс #2
ПАРА: Дэйзи Хэйтс & Кристиан Хэммес & …
🌟 Эмоциональные качели
🌟 Лондонская криминальная семья
🌟 Друзья с привилегиями
🌟 Приобретенная семья
🌟 Любовный треугольник
🌟 Тронешь её — умрёшь
Просим НЕ использовать русифицированные обложки книг в таких социальных сетях, как: Тик Ток, Инстаграм, Твиттер, Фейсбук
Искать тут 😘
@AmorN
❌❌❌🔤эйзи 🔤эйтс
❌— Почему в меня вообще должны стрелять? — хмурюсь я.
— Даже не знаю, — пожимает плечами брат. — Может, потому, что ты в хаотичном любовном треугольнике с двумя недоростками — главарями банд?
Готовьте ваши пальчики, вас ждет 522 сноски в книге 😌
❌Любовь не всегда нежная.
Она может быть громкой, опасной, неправильной.
Она может разбивать, обжигать, сводить с ума.
Но если она настоящая — ты всё равно выберешь её.
❌В мире, где сердце — это риск,
где чувства не всегда безопасны,
мы всё равно продолжаем читать истории о любви.
❌Сегодня — день для тех, кто верит в великие истории.
В любовь, которая ломает правила.
В чувства, которые невозможно стереть.
❌❌Happy …
🔤обрая самаритянка
❌❌❌❌❌❌❌🔤 🔤ad girl
❌Потому что сколько бы розового я ни надела, сколько бы добрых дел ни совершила, то одно предложение: пять слов, тридцать пять знаков, включая пробелы, высечено в камне…
❌ 🤩 ГОТОВЫЙ ПЕРЕВОД 🎀
КНИГА: Искупленные грешники
АВТОР: Сомма Скетчер
СЕРИЯ: Анонимные грешники #4
ПАРА: Габриэль Висконти и Рэн Харлоу
😎Мафиозный роман в маленьком городке
😎Разница в возрасте (32 & 21)
😎Угрюмый & Жизнерадостная
😎Slow burn
😎Главная героиня девственница
😎Морально серый герой
😎Клиффхэнгер
Просим НЕ использовать русифицированные обложки книг в таких социальных сетях, как: Тик Ток, Инстаграм, Твиттер…
❌🔤скупленные 🔤РЕШНИКИ
❌Он наступает, а я неуклюже пячусь. Еще несколько шагов — и он на расстоянии вытянутой руки, на расстоянии захвата, если судить по яростному огню в его глазах, — так что я делаю единственное, что приходит в голову.
❌— Какого хуя ты делаешь? — рычит Габриэль.
❌— Притворяюсь мертвой, — шепчу я.
❌Боже. Зачем я ему это сказала?
❌❌❌❌🤩🤩🤩🤩
❌❌❌🤩омма 🤩кетчер
💔123❤66🥰19❤🔥11😍3💋2🤗2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lorenhalefucksbetter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Аморки 💓 Какую книгу вы бы хотели получить следующей?
Принц Братвы - Т. Дж. Магуайр27%
Нечто прекрасное - Криста и Бекка Ритчи (последняя книга серии)24%
Магнолия Паркс: Долгая дорога домой - Джесса Хэйстингс31%
Околдованный - Эмили Макинтайер (последняя книга серии)18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 17 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒂.𝒃𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒔 💚 @hinabooks · 29,927 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 September 2026
♡ книжный шкаф ♡ @lilybookcase · 30,786 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
cmolerwbook @cmolerwbookk · 56,505 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
Bookssloover @bookssloveer · 30,303 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AmorNovels” (@lorenhalefucksbetter), 10,226 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorenhalefucksbetter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.