Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for « 𝑳𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒊𝒙𝒙.𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒔 – 💭 »

Channel

« 𝑳𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒊𝒙𝒙.𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒔 – 💭 »

@loonixxbeads

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001931599574
TypeChannel
Username@loonixxbeads
Created17 July 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/loonixxbeads

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥825.8%
😁619.4%
516.1%
💘39.68%
26.45%
💋26.45%
❤‍🔥13.23%
🍓13.23%
👍13.23%
🕊13.23%
🥰13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2023 to 18 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2023, 20:11 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Я перейшла у @helpfromvixi , м'юшки, переходьте туди

😁2

18 Jul 2023, 13:49 UTC132 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Невеликий спойлер нової роботи )) Як думаєте , хто це ?

💘2🔥2😁1

18 Jul 2023, 11:23 UTC71 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

» На удачу ! ! . . 💭

  1. ❤️‍🔥38%
  2. 💔8%
  3. ❤️‍🩹46%
  4. ❤️8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2💋1😁1

17 Jul 2023, 14:49 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Перемагає "Н" тож чекайте авторську, повністю намальовану мною схему ))

2🔥1

17 Jul 2023, 14:24 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

З ким схему? (Є тільки перші букви щоб було ніби анонімно)

  1. К20%
  2. Н50%
  3. С30%
  4. К0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1😁1

17 Jul 2023, 14:03 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

super cool канальчик про яскраву дівчину з Німеччини^^ — оновлення інстаграму — нові тік токи — ютуб шортс — матеріал з другого акаунту усе цікаве про Діну та її яскраве життя!!

🔥1

17 Jul 2023, 12:59 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

У мене вже є ідея для нової авторської схеми, я ще такого ні у кого не бачила

😁1

17 Jul 2023, 12:33 UTC103 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

(⁠。⁠•̀⁠ᴗ⁠-⁠)⁠✧ Нова робота ! ! . . . Це коала 🐨 Закінчила я її ще вчора ввечері але оскільки канал створений сьогодні, показую її сьогодні Робила за схемою ось цієї дівчини — https://t.me/my_beadssss #нова_робота

1❤‍🔥1🍓1👍1💋1💘1🔥1🕊1

17 Jul 2023, 12:28 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

(⁠ ⁠╹⁠▽⁠╹⁠ ⁠) Усім привіт . . ! ! Це канал про бісероплетіння, мої роботи та мій прогрес Tags :: #тестування #нова_робота #схема Хештеги будуть поповнюватись Вп – @vploonixxbeads Власниця – @Loona0x

1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @loonixxbeads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2023, 11:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz13 voters

» На удачу ! ! . . 💭

  1. ❤️‍🔥38%
  2. 💔8%
  3. ❤️‍🩹46%
  4. ❤️8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2023, 14:24 UTCFinal Results10 voters

З ким схему? (Є тільки перші букви щоб було ніби анонімно)

  1. К20%
  2. Н50%
  3. С30%
  4. К0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2023 to 18 July 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“« 𝑳𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒊𝒙𝒙.𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒔 – 💭 »” (@loonixxbeads). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loonixxbeads.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.