Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 78 days, net -131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,471–25,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 09:00
25,529
+5
23 Oct 2026, 08:05
25,524
-30
22 Oct 2026, 08:20
25,554
-5
20 Oct 2026, 22:30
25,559
-17
19 Oct 2026, 17:47
25,576
-17
18 Oct 2026, 17:30
25,593
-29
17 Oct 2026, 16:28
25,622
-10
16 Oct 2026, 18:37
25,632
-14
15 Oct 2026, 16:06
25,646
-2
14 Oct 2026, 12:46
25,648
-17
12 Oct 2026, 22:29
25,665
-61
8 Oct 2026, 14:21
25,726
-7
4 Oct 2026, 01:00
25,733
-58
25 Sept 2026, 08:17
25,791
-20
17 Sept 2026, 05:58
25,811
-1
15 Sept 2026, 05:16
25,812
+13
13 Sept 2026, 10:37
25,799
+3
11 Sept 2026, 17:20
25,796
-23
9 Sept 2026, 05:01
25,819
-10
5 Sept 2026, 20:56
25,829
first reading
Engagement
124 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.52%
avg views ÷ 25,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
388
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.709%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 124 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held
124 (4 August 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total
18,611
Reactions total
132
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 08:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
41m 56s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
315 reactions across 115 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
293
93.0%
👍
8
2.54%
🤔
4
1.27%
💯
3
0.952%
👏
2
0.635%
🔥
2
0.635%
🗿
2
0.635%
🥰
1
0.317%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍂 Осень - лучшее время, чтобы cделать чек-ап для своего ребёнка!
Совсем скоро зима: праздники, каникулы, поездки, болезни. Затем весна, а там и лето — отпуска, дача, отдых.
🎁 До 31 октября в «Логопотаме» можно БЕСПЛАТНО пройти чек-ап речи по 60+ параметрам!
Вы получите не просто консультацию, а подробный письменный отчёт с результатами проверки и рекомендациями логопеда.
✅ Бесплатно до 31 октября
— вы получаете п…
Поэтому я всегда говорю родителям) важно не сравнивать мальчиков и девочек, а понимать особенности именно вашего ребёнка ❤️
Например, в нашей школе «Логопотам» мы разработали собственную методологию Логопотам NEXT. В ней объединили проверенные логопедические практики, игровые занятия и современные технологии.
У нас ребёнок не просто повторяет звуки за логопедом. Он учится через игру, движение, интересные игры и люб…
💬 Мнение эксперта: Правда ли, что девочки развиваются намного быстрее мальчиков?
Поделилась своим мнением как специалист о том, действительно ли мальчики отстают в развитии от девочек опираясь на свою практику в работе с детьми.
Делитесь своими наблюдениями в комментариях! Очень интересно узнать, как это было у ваших детей.
Замечали ли вы разницу в развитии своих детей? Кто раньше начал говорить, проявлять самостоятельность, осваивать новые навыки?
👇 Поделитесь своими наблюдениями в комментариях!
Да, девочки развиваются быстрее!63%
Нет, мальчики опережают девочек0%
Не заметила разницы, всё индивидуально25%
Хочу узнать мнение специалиста13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👦 Правда ли, что мальчики развиваются медленнее девочек?
Наверняка вы слышали: «Ну он же мальчик! Мальчики позже начинают говорить, им нужно больше времени».
Но действительно ли это так?
Особенно интересно мнение родителей, у которых есть и сын, и дочь! 💜
А я чуть позже расскажу, что думаю на этот счёт как специалист, и разберу, действительно ли пол ребёнка влияет на темпы развития.
Ребёнку 5 лет, а его всё ещё кормят с ложки. Это нормально? 🥄
Иногда ребёнок умеет есть сам, но просит помочь. А иногда ему пока трудно управляться с ложкой, удерживать внимание и самостоятельно справляться с обедом.
Важно посмотреть, как ребёнок справляется и с другими задачами.
Возможно, вы замечаете, что ему также трудно:
— самостоятельно одеваться и застёгивать одежду;
— прыгать на одной ноге, удерживать равно…
💚 💚💚💚
Что должен уметь ребёнок в 5 лет по мнению логопеда и нейропсихолога?
🎁 До 31 октября можно БЕСПЛАТНО пройти чек-ап речи по 60+ параметрам!
Вы получите не просто консультацию, а подробный письменный отчёт с результатами проверки и рекомендациями логопеда.
✅ Бесплатно до 31 октября
— вы получаете полноценную проверку речи с опытным логопедом без дополнительных затрат.
✅ Проверка по 60+ параметрам
— специалист…
Папы редко говорят о своих страхах,
но именно они учат нас не бояться.
Редко говорят «люблю», но их любовь чувствуется в каждом деле, в каждой мелочи.
С праздником тех, кто держит этот мир на своих плечах, и делает вид, что это легко ❤
Поздравляем с Днем папы! 🥰
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @logopedbubu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Замечали ли вы разницу в развитии своих детей? Кто раньше начал говорить, проявлять самостоятельность, осваивать новые навыки?
👇 Поделитесь своими наблюдениями в комментариях!
Да, девочки развиваются быстрее!63%
Нет, мальчики опережают девочек0%
Не заметила разницы, всё индивидуально25%
Хочу узнать мнение специалиста13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
4️⃣ Ребёнку 6 лет, скоро в школу
При этом ребёнку сложно пересказать короткую историю, объяснить правила игры или последовательно рассказать о событии. Что бы вы сделали?
А) Увеличить количество заданий на чтение, чтобы ребёнок быстрее привыкал к школьной нагрузке.5%
Б) Больше тренировать память: учить длинные стихи и пересказывать их наизусть.5%
В) Уделять внимание связной речи: учить объяснять, пересказывать своими словами и выстраивать послед89%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1️⃣ Ребёнок долго подбирает слово и не может закончить предложение. Что лучше сделать?
А) Попрошу повторять слово, пока не получится правильно.26%
Б) Не буду обращать внимания на ошибку.0%
В) Еще раз повторю слово правильно, не прерывая разговор.74%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Онлайн-школа «Логопотам» || логопед, развитие речи” (@logopedbubu), 25,529 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logopedbubu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.