Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LocalTrade

Channel

LocalTrade

@localtradecc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

27,295subscribers

-23,045 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148377852
TypeChannel
Username@localtradecc
DescriptionAI-native digital assets exchange Built through 9+ years of real market cycles. https://linktr.ee/localtrade.cc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2016 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/localtradecc

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27,29550,34038,817.57 August 2026 — 50,340 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,340 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,321 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,295 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,266 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,257 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,245 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,244 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,199 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,158 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,118 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,116 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,197 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,165 subscribers22 August 2026 — 45,113 subscribers23 August 2026 — 45,042 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,980 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,910 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,859 subscribers28 August 2026 — 44,799 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,748 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,658 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,585 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,532 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,494 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,421 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,312 subscribers7 September 2026 — 44,013 subscribers10 September 2026 — 43,681 subscribers12 September 2026 — 43,395 subscribers14 September 2026 — 43,265 subscribers16 September 2026 — 43,157 subscribers18 September 2026 — 42,991 subscribers1 October 2026 — 34,361 subscribers6 October 2026 — 31,521 subscribers10 October 2026 — 30,246 subscribers13 October 2026 — 30,090 subscribers15 October 2026 — 30,008 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,746 subscribers17 October 2026 — 29,448 subscribers18 October 2026 — 29,357 subscribers19 October 2026 — 27,295 subscribers7 August 202619 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 73 days, net -23,045. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,838–53,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Oct 2026, 03:1627,295-2,062
18 Oct 2026, 01:1929,357-91
17 Oct 2026, 02:3829,448-298
16 Oct 2026, 00:0029,746-262
15 Oct 2026, 01:1830,008-82
13 Oct 2026, 23:1630,090-156
10 Oct 2026, 19:1830,246-1,275
6 Oct 2026, 15:2231,521-2,840
1 Oct 2026, 16:3534,361-8,630
18 Sept 2026, 12:1842,991-166
16 Sept 2026, 02:5843,157-108
14 Sept 2026, 05:5543,265-130
12 Sept 2026, 15:4143,395-286
10 Sept 2026, 14:3643,681-332
7 Sept 2026, 12:3944,013-299
4 Sept 2026, 13:1944,312-109
2 Sept 2026, 21:3444,421-73
1 Sept 2026, 22:4744,494-38
1 Sept 2026, 01:3544,532-53
31 Aug 2026, 04:1244,585first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 27,295 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,970
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held31 (16 July 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total20,770
Reactions total561
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,190
Videos
≈38
Links
≈942

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
50s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,256 reactions across 31 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍41518.4%
🔥40518.0%
❤37316.5%
🎉37216.5%
👏32614.5%
🥰803.55%
🤩783.46%
😍743.28%
💯713.15%
❤‍🔥622.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Oct 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,550 views93 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

📌 How can JexAI help you trade? Markets are fractal, you can't see everything at once. That's where AI Agents like Jex can help; he won't trade for you, but he will make your trading sessions easier, less irritating and focused. ⚙️ What Jex can do for you? – Run asset analysis and tell about order flows, liquidity density, and known strong levels based off known orderbook data; – Place trades directly from the chat…

🎉19🔥18❤14🥰10👍8👏8😍6💯4

12 Oct 2026, 15:48 UTC≈3,050 views99 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

⚙️Trading Automation is a Thing since late 1980ies, and evenmoreso in current age AI Hype Cycle So what are your options to Automate Trading for yourself? Is it even possible? And how does it work? 💬Basic premise of automation is simple: you take API keys, slot them into a trading software like MetaTrader 5 (or a script of your own making), and trade from there. But there's more than meets the eye here. ⚡️Ranked …

🎉22👍18🔥15❤10👏9🤩9💯6❤‍🔥4

9 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC≈3,080 views13 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

There's 2 major roablocks between you and successfull career as a trader Everything else you'll encounter is just questions of skill, knowledge and practice The two major roablocks are FUD and FOMO: FUD is Fear, Uncertainity and Despair, and it refelcts exactly that: market panics, opens up Twitter feed, reads doomy posts, panic even more, and every price change, no matter how small, gets treated as the harbringer…

❤5👍3🔥3👏2

8 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈3,200 views158 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

⚙️ How to find next Crypto Gem? Screenshot your price chart and copy this Claude Opus Prompt: "Analyze this price chart screenshot. Identify direction, current trend, it's strength, support/resistance, MA relationships, volume patterns and chart formations; use Tier-0 and Tier-1 web data to compare it with live project fundamentals: unlock dates, upgrades, on-chain revenue, consensus data, Certik Skynet data, Hacke…

❤24🎉21🔥21👍19💯16🥰14🤩13👏12

7 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC≈2,080 views92 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

Suppose you want your AI agent to trade for you, but how would you do that? 🔥 There's a tool type for that called MCP, or Model Context Protocol, people who built it call it "a USB-C port for AI applications". It's an open standard for using external tools like a crypto trading platform. ⚡️ Trading MCP works like this: your AI stops guessing from a chart image it was handed, and starts reading account, positions, q…

🔥21👍18❤14👏11🎉9😍7💯5🥰4

25 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC≈3,660 views55 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

⚙️ How to tell if the trade worth the risk? Sharpe Index. It's a simple number: the higher it is, the better. It answers one simple question: is money worth the risk? Let's talk examples. Suppose you have 2 Copytraders. One did slow and conservative trades over 3 months, and made you, say, $1000 in returns. The other spiked $2000, crashed $1500, then spiked $250, the crashed again for $750, and suddenly at the…

👍14❤12🔥12🎉9👏7🤩1

22 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC≈3,150 views51 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

📌 How to look up the market, the easy way Coin360: market heatmap, always fresh out of on-chain and index price data DeFiLlama: place to look up chain revenue to see if project has any potential and check TVL Token Terminal: take a deeper dive into fundamental data: fees, revenue, aggregate trading volume by chain, gas used, active users and much more Glassnode: turns raw blockchain data to visual charts so you c…

🎉12❤11👏11👍10🔥7

18 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC≈3,150 views56 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

💬Trade by Chatting with LocalTrade Your phone — your trading terminal, that is how we see it at LocalTrade. ⚙️ JexAI is always there for you to make trading as easy, as chatting from your smartphone. Don't need complicated trading terminals, just AI Agent helping you take a grasp over the market. Whether it's market insights, recent news, trading chart analysis or picking a copytrader: Jex has your back. ⚙️ [ Tr…

🎉16🔥15👍10❤8👏7

15 Sept 2026, 20:42 UTC≈3,690 views71 reactionsread 19 October 2026

🔔 US Democrats voted against Crypto Clarity Act, $BTC nosedived past major support at 76k towards 74k $BTC is pushing past major support at 76k, so here is breakdown on how US Parliament influenced $BTC and caused short-term sellout. 🔈 On September 15, 2026, US Senate voted 49–50 on a motion to proceed Crypto Clarity Act. To pass it needed 60 votes. All Democrats and a few Republicans blocked it, and the bill is de…

👍16🎉15🔥14👏12❤7❤‍🔥2💯2🤩2

11 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC≈3,330 views85 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

⚙️ How to tell if the trade worth the risk? Sharpe Index. It's a simple number: the higher it is, the better. It answers one simple question: is money worth the risk? Let's talk examples. Suppose you have 2 Copytraders. One did slow and conservative trades over 3 months, and made you, say, $1000 in returns. The other spiked $2000, crashed $1500, then spiked $250, the crashed again for $750, and suddenly at the…

❤17👍14🔥14👏13🎉10🤩5❤‍🔥4🥰3

9 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC≈3,150 views53 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

💳 x10 trading advice: Lost a trade? Take a breather Not all trades will be profitable, some happen at a loss. When loss happens our brains perceive it as a kind of damage, a pain. Most traders who do well in market has their flight-or-flight response calibrated to fight, and so, they go on for revengetrading spree. 💬 Revenge trading is a thing: you lose and want to take revenge on a market. It happens to the best o…

👍13👏13❤10🔥9🎉8

7 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,490 views56 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

🔔 Losing focus during trading? Time to call it a day Trading is 80% psychology and 20% technical analysis. Even with the best trading system you can still suffer losses. 💬 Today we'll talk about one of the most common loss reasons: defocus, and how not to lose money to it. Every trader can get stuck in a 14h loop of hunting the next best gem. It happens, nothing to be ashamed of. ⚙️ But that is how newcomers lose…

🔥14🎉13👍12❤11👏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @localtradecc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@localtradecc edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LocalTrade” (@localtradecc), 27,295 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/localtradecc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.