Channel
@loadingloving
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,052subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001105070179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loadingloving |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 May 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loadingloving |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1,280 average views per post against 1,052 subscribers — an engagement rate of 121.4%. Across the 13,511 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 7.02% and 26.8%, with a median of 14.3%.
| Window | 30 days (26 July 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (3 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 25,551 |
| Mature posts only | 124.2% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,052 measured 22 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:fas · 13,511 channels · p10 3.35% · p25 7.02% · p50 14.3% · p75 26.8% · p90 44.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.001th percentile · 8.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.278% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 1,052 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 1,050 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 1,048 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 1,047 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1,042 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 1,041 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 1,041 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,551 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
47 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 48.9% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 25.5% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بلز پاسکال قرنها پیش متوجه شد: «تمامِ مشکلاتِ بشر از این ناشی میشود که نمیتواند به تنهایی در یک اتاق آرام بنشیند.» ما مدام گوشتِ ذهنمان را جلوی سرصداهای بیرون میاندازیم؛ با شبکههای اجتماعی، شلوغیهای کاذب، و رابطههای دمِدستی. چون اگر همهچیز برای چند ساعت ساکت شود، باید با صداهایی روبرو شویم که سالهاست از آنها فرار کردهایم: صدای پشیمانی، صداقت، و پوچیهای دستنخورده... @loadingloving ♥️
👍2
آخر شبی یاد اینجملهی #محموددرویش افتادم. «قد مات فينا فجأة ما نشتهيه ويشتهينا» یعنی انگار یهو در ما چیزی مُرد که میخواستیمش و میخواستمون. واقعا حال چرک مزخرفیه. فک کن! هم میخواستیش هم میخواستدت، ولی یهو دیگه چیزی نیست انگار. فقط یه گردی نشسته اون تهمها... @loadingloving ♥️
😢3👏1
خطرناک ترین آدمایی که دیدم اونایی بودن که واقعا خودشونو آدم خوبی می دونستن... در حالیکه هر داستانی رو به نفع خودشون تغییر میدادن، از هر مسئولیتی فرار می کنن، و هیچ وقت گردن نمی گیرن که شاید به کسی آسیب زده باشن. توی ذهنشون اونا هیچ وقت مقصر نیستن.. ولی عجیب اینجاست که همیشه بقیه مقصرن @loadingloving ♥️
❤1
یکی از چیزهای کوچکی که شاید یادآوریش جلوی بسیاری از آسیبها رو بگیره اینه که بدونیم آدمها نقشها و جایگاههای متفاوت، با میزان صمیمتهای متفاوتی نسبت به ما دارن و لزوما همه "دوست و امن" نیستن. "یکی صرفا همکاره، یکی صرفا همکلاسیه، یکی صرفا خویشاونده و نه هیچ چیزِ بیشتر." @loadingloving ♥️
👍1
👌👌 @loadingloving ♥️
👌1👍1
ریلكه نوشت: «عشق یعنی دو تنهایی که از هم محافظت میکنند.» نه دو کمبود که همدیگر را میبلعند. نه دو زخم که از هم تغذیه میکنند. نه دو ترس که اسمشان را گذاشتهاند صمیمیت. عشقِ بالغ، فضا میدهد. خفه نمیکند. میفهمد که نزدیکی، بدون احترام به مرزها خیلی زود تبدیل میشود به فرسایش. بعضیها تو را از دست نمیدهند چون دور شدی؛ چون زیادی نزدیک آمدند و نفست را بریدند.. @loadingloving ♥️
بعضی آدمها را وقتی از دست میدهی میفهمی. تا وقتی هستند، طبیعی بهنظر میرسند؛ مثل هوا، مثل نور، مثل چیزی که فکر میکنی همیشه هست. بعد نبودنشان نه فقط جای آنها، که شکلِ اتاق را عوض میکند. فقدان، عجیبترین معلمِ جهان است. خیلی چیزها را فقط وقتی میفهماند که دیگر برای جبران، دیر شده... @loadingloving ♥️
هیچوقت سعی نکنید آدم خوبهی هیچ داستانی باشید، خودتون باشین و هیچوقت به کمتر از استانداردهاتون راضی نشین وقتی رعایت حال بقیه رو میکنید از نظر بقیه دم دستی تلقی میشین چه تو کار، چه تو رابطه، چه فامیل، چه دوست @loadingloving ♥️
کافکا جایی مینویسد: «من قفسم، در جستوجوی پرنده...» بعضی آدمها دقیقاً همیناند. نه عاشقِ تو، عاشقِ داشتنِ چیزیاند که آزادیشان را پر کند. تو را نمیخواهند چون فهمیدهای؛ میخواهند چون خلأ دارند. فاجعه اینجاست که خیلیها اسمِ نیاز را میگذارند عشق... و بعد تعجب میکنند چرا رابطه، بهجای پرواز، بوی اسارت میدهد.. @loadingloving ♥️
❤1
آرزو میکنم چیزی که سر ذوقتون میاره، چشاتون رو اشکی میکنه، قند تو دلتون آب میکنه در ناباورانهترین روزای زندگیتون اتفاق بیفته. @loadingloving ♥️
❤3
یه وقتایی لازمه حستونو فراموش کنین و لیاقتتون رو به یاد بیارین @loadingloving ♥️
👍1
تولستوی جملهی مشهوری دارد: «همهی خانوادههای خوشبخت شبیه هماند، اما هر خانوادهی بدبختی به شیوهی خودش بدبخت است..» رابطهها هم همیناند. سلامت، ساختارِ سادهای دارد: صداقت، احترام، امنیت، گفتوگو. اما ویرانی، هزار مدل دارد. سوءتفاهم، غرور، سکوت، وابستگی، تحقیر، رقابت، خستگی، ترس. برای همین تعمیرِ بعضی رابطهها سخت است؛ چون مشکلِ آنها «یک چیز» نیست. یک سیستمِ معیوب است که هر بار از جای تازهای نشتی میدهد.. @loa…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @loadingloving. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دلنوشته های کاغذی” (@loadingloving), 1,052 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loadingloving.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.