Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 秋小晨的文件

Channel

秋小晨的文件

@lmqxclf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,697subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003571159424
TypeChannel
Username@lmqxclf
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 17 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lmqxclf

Growth

4,6974,7384,717.515 August 2026 — 4,735 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,735 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,738 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,727 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,713 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,712 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,702 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,697 subscribers15 August 20261 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 17 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,691–4,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 18:074,697-5
29 Aug 2026, 20:554,702-10
26 Aug 2026, 15:434,712-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:394,713-14
19 Aug 2026, 21:294,727-11
16 Aug 2026, 19:364,738+3
15 Aug 2026, 15:004,735no change
15 Aug 2026, 14:464,735first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,035 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49547.8%
🤔12311.9%
👍696.67%
😭656.28%
🥰514.93%
🦄494.73%
🔥403.86%
🤬333.19%
👎302.90%
🤣191.84%
🖕121.16%
😍80.773%
😱80.773%
70.676%
🍌70.676%
😁60.58%
👏50.483%
🤓50.483%
😢30.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,035 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 May 2026, 06:49 UTC≈7,430 views84 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

修复闪框

🔥37🤬318🤓3🤣3👍2

24 Apr 2026, 19:15 UTC≈11,600 views84 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

尝试修复24号游戏更新的新闪框

🥰3520🤣167🤔6

18 Apr 2026, 09:31 UTC≈13,000 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

尝试修复加密导致的骨骼乱飞,非强制更新

33🤬2

17 Apr 2026, 05:18 UTC≈13,400 views44 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

pubgm修复服务器链接失败

40🤔4

15 Apr 2026, 14:18 UTC≈12,000 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

适配新版本,有bug或者要加的衣服私信我就行,@tian2401988

23🤓2👎1

14 Mar 2026, 04:03 UTC≈17,200 views89 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

强制更新到4.3版本 旧版本不在支持 修复部分bug,兼容越南服

🦄49👎149🤔9😱8

25 Feb 2026, 19:06 UTC≈19,700 views237 reactionsread 15 August 2026

pubg旧版本是1月31号支持4-6系 pubg新版本只支持5.10系以上

🤔104😭65👍2412👎11😍8👏5🔥3

18 Feb 2026, 14:45 UTC≈20,100 views67 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

添加回改速度,默认0.01秒刷新就回改,如果枪械只有倍镜,可尝试加一点点,但不要太多,不然容易1秒,过去是1秒后才回改 添加普通触摸和内核触摸选择,其同时选择五即可设置 漏打改为真漏打,漏哪打哪,但我没测试,毕竟wow里面只能检测对面漏脚,打的难受

👍4119🍌7

15 Feb 2026, 17:16 UTC≈17,500 views112 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

首先祝兄弟们除夕快乐 以下辅助相关: 目前当前辅助实现了内核级触摸(兼容平板) 盒子美化,载具秒刷 衣服秒刷,枪械秒刷,掩体判断,并且盒子支持只对自己生效,载具 枪械无需上车或者手持即可秒刷 所有hook操作都是内核层硬件断点后直接修改硬件寄存器以达到的效果,全程不注入附加任何进程,不修改任何可执行内存和函数指针 但是从7月份至现在一直都存在闪退问题,这几天在加急搞载具美化和盒子只对自己生效 所以我希望这几天 如果遇到闪退 愿意帮我排查问题的 可以只开掩体判断或者美化秒刷,如果超过四个小时不闪退或者闪退,都可以私信我,以加速我定位问题 以下硬件断点相关: 辅助经过多次内测,目前已经确定pubgm大概率没有硬件断点检测,所以你能见到一个堪比直装的内核,其次 就是回答一下硬件断点相关的问题 问: 硬件断点如何确定为真? 答: 使用agg修改器下到断点槽位没有,如果这个项目还有效果,就是假,一般arm64可执行断点槽位是6个

106👎4👍2

Signed 小晨

15 Feb 2026, 17:08 UTC≈12,700 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9😁1

Signed 小晨

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lmqxclf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“秋小晨的文件” (@lmqxclf), 4,697 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lmqxclf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.