Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 李里梨lilili私密频道

Channel

李里梨lilili私密频道

@lll11331

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,965subscribers

+6,614 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004357685042
TypeChannel
Username@lll11331
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 16 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lll11331

Growth

1,3519,4395,39525 August 2026 — 1,351 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,366 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,279 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,439 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,965 subscribers7,96525 August 20263 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6,614. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–10,652 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 19:367,965-1,474
31 Aug 2026, 16:439,439+2,160
29 Aug 2026, 00:387,279+4,913
26 Aug 2026, 03:372,366+1,015
25 Aug 2026, 20:301,351first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 7,965 subscribers
Avg views / post
898
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.061%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held18 (16 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total16,162
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 25s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC126 viewsread 25 August 2026
Video

👉更多活动点此查看 大队官网: https://xcdd.sh 🎟️ 抽奖活动:长宁嫩妹李里梨 📪活动说明:中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 🎫 参与方式: 🎫 加入-李里梨lilili私密频道 🎫 加入-上海修车大队公开榜2.0 🎫 加入-上海修车大队 🎁 奖品列表: 💰️ 18.88元现金口令红包 × 1 💰️ 28.88元现金口令红包 × 1 💰️ 38.88元现金口令红包 × 1 📅 开奖时间:2026-08-31 21:30自动开奖 👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/choujiang_bot?start=join-L178767028964

25 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC217 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @chuangtougui99Photo

老师名字:李里梨 老师电报号:@lilili11333 看朋友推荐的妹子,人照10(跳舞视频)自述是中韩混血,北方嫩妹无口音,163左右🐻c挺拔,屁股大微微有点小肚子算轻微bbw,锁骨有小纹身,今天见的是素颜不过也非常可爱,刚下海还是有点生疏,正常嫩妹三件套,目前在长宁高端小区很棒,情绪价值不错商k过来的有保障,🐍吻不算莽但要就给,口活中规中矩但是不喊停不停也算ok,今天正好穿的一套蕾丝睡裙很对口味就没让脱,正戏从头开亲身上香香的,反馈还不错,69👅好吃无异味,湿的很快水挺多的,接着传教,渐入佳境水越来越多,声音越来越大,接着换站立后入,这姿势太爽了,直接顶着丰满的臀部DuangDuang的冲刺,一下就来感觉了直接缴械,今日份的丢人两个姿势就结束,事后聊聊天也不催人,还是得改日再战。可爱型微胖嫩妹,喜🐻屁股bbw的可以猛冲,排骨党勿入。

24 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC432 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🎖精英作业🎖 💃艺名:李里梨 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/31227 ⛳️位置: #长宁区 🙍‍♂️学生:滴 滴 (爱吃湘菜) ———————————————— 新上的ls 看颜是我喜欢的类型 长宁小区安全性还可以 见面人照一致跟跳舞视频一比一 非常滴可爱身穿蕾丝睡衣又显得诱人至极,接着自行洗洗,洗完ls已经坐在床边,我一把搂住直接开🐍,连亲带摸,惹得梨梨娇喘连连,接着口活,只能说嫩妹常规无功无过,换69,反馈不错毛不多挺好吃的,戴套开战,吊感非常好,配合丰满的身材撞起来QQ弹弹,水也特别充足,换后入,浪臀十分明显太过于舒服导致我直接被秒😭事后抱抱亲亲摸摸也不抗拒,情绪价值不错。总结微胖的bbw嫩妹颜值可爱略微小肚子。能接受小肚子可以直接冲~

24 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC460 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

早安哥哥们😘 今日元气满满🥳 约课: @lilili11333

1

23 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC477 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

喜欢吗 特地拍给你看的😘 约课: @lilili11333

22 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC647 viewsread 25 August 2026

谢谢上海的哥哥们的照顾 8月22日课🈵 8月23日课🈵 8月24日可🈷️

21 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

吃饭了吗 看看我是不是你的菜🥰 约课: @lilili11333

20 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC≈2,320 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026

主打一个年龄小听劝,耐操,观望的宝宝们,接受降价挑战吗,降一点不如不降,所以那就多降点。🔥🔥🔥🔥 价格调整: 单P 1300➡️1000 两次PP 2300➡️1900

4

20 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactionsread 25 August 2026

李里梨 进门看到穿jk的妹妹,妆容精致,穿搭好看身材佳,人照9,微胖型嫩妹,有学生气,迫不及待洗漱后进入正题。在床上简单寒暄几句感觉妹妹挺礼貌乖巧,问什么答什么,慢慢脱了衣服,妹妹的惹火身材展现在我眼前,该瘦的地方瘦该有肉的地方有肉。前戏阶段妹妹很配合,舌吻要就有,反馈也真实,感觉妹妹之前做的比较少,没亲昵一会就娇喘不停。逐步舔到下方,妹妹肥美的大腿和好看的私处都让我沉迷。都没让妹妹口就忍不住戴套传教士体位进入正戏,首先感觉到的就是紧致和极强的包裹感,一边看着妹妹可爱的脸蛋和丰满摇晃的胸部一边运动,真是想立刻交待了。好在还是忍住换了多个体位,好好享受了一番满意交货。整个过程妹妹都很听话很乖,有求必应,我非常喜欢,已经忍不住约二刷了。 标签: @lilili11333 #李里梨 1300p #长宁 点击跳转原始报告【需先加群】 反馈狼友: 暗v 时间:2026-08-19 11:14:56 报告ID:17303 当前进度:1/

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lll11331. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“李里梨lilili私密频道” (@lll11331), 7,965 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lll11331.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.