Channel
@liyan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,407subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003657733209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liyan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 17 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liyan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 2,407 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 2,416 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:40 | 2,428 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 2,429 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 2,429 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 71.4% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
骗子曝光❗️❗️❗️ TG昵称：变故 Veum 用户名：@jjkx429 被骗金额：70元 收款地址：它妈的里面输入了70元的才有了它。 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=6880098869 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=6880098869 被骗过程：找他出身份证，发个打码的假核验过来，打款后我在小助手验证不通过，出假单。 公示人：ptg686_1 我要投稿 我要申诉
❤1
tg昵称：若水码反百分百 用户名：@wyq1012 被骗金额：16usdt 收款地址：okpay过账 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=8593031818 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=8593031818 被骗过程：傻逼p假单让我过账过完账消失不见这傻逼弄个对象精分上tg号也不知道这傻逼网恋哪里认识的母狗这个钱当给这个傻逼买棺材了穷逼 公式人：他爹 我要投稿 我要申诉
❤1
TG昵称：ᥬ南渡🛡️ （转账请语音确认） 用户名：@ruxjt 被骗金额： 收款地址：TDR18bVfUGCZrvLZLVWg53fNbfQFRnUjEq 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=8557289575 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=8557289575 被骗过程：买了一个微信55u，第二天就修改密码了，然后3月18日找他买2张贵州电信卡232u，5天了发信息已读不回，一直不发货。 总计骗了我287u，群也把我踢了拉黑了。 公示人：他爹 我要投稿 我要申诉
骗子曝光❗️❗️❗️ TG昵称：恪守 用户名：@botdcx 被骗金额：5u 收款地址： okpay 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=8038052203 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=8038052203 被骗过程：预存后让他退我就装死 公示人：@hz_zhuli 我要投稿 我要申诉
骗子曝光❗️❗️❗️ TG昵称：Read7 破解支百源头 用户名：@Reaorry7 被骗金额：10U 收款地址：OKPAY 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=7035466627 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=7035466627 被骗过程：说单回了 我后来又转他1U不回复了 钱收了不回复 我觉得10U不至于 但是就是不回复了 已经等了一天就是不回复 公示人：@taotai7 我要投稿 我要申诉
骗子曝光❗️❗️❗️ TG昵称：梓涵 号商 用户名：@yyyy520612 被骗金额：500U 收款地址：TDxQYxwpJBLaxfTPjZwJ1kkWFXhXLi9fjb 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=8015127583 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=8015127583 被骗过程：六合彩带货，说让我带货，搞了一个假得新币公群，在哪里骗人 公示人：无 我要投稿 我要申诉
骗子曝光❗️❗️❗️ TG昵称：ax（天眼查档） 用户名：@axcd007 被骗金额：85u 收款地址： 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=7359797306 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=7359797306 被骗过程：美团提供了个长期未使用的账号出全部出来了又扯皮让他拿证据不拿 听不懂人话 首先 手机号不是他名下的了 其次这个账号好久未使用 公示人：https://t.me/xxghkf 我要投稿 我要申诉
❤3
TG昵称：达利公群1726，业务员：卡大师「精养|抗封|二次实名」 用户名： @kds2026 被骗金额：130u 收款地址：TKRRXYYA3nKqXLSGPmhG1NkYY3T2UC2TRR 安卓主页链接： tg://openmessage?user_id=8225429102 IOS主页链接：tg://user?id=8225429102 被骗过程：于2026年3月15日在公群1726卡大师@kds2026购买一张贵州电信手机卡130u，报备单号为260315013703，2026年3月17日收到卡之后，一镜到底拍摄视频，发现卡插上手机之后无服务，为报废卡，业务员以我未按照验收规则推卸责任，公群老板和业务员就是这样做生意欺骗钱财的？群里面整天都禁止发言。 公示人：@shengcai969 我要投稿 我要申诉
🤣2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @liyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,319,397 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@liyan named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“厉严防诈” (@liyan), 2,407 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.