4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,171–5,267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:58
5,256
+34
10 Aug 2026, 22:13
5,222
+40
7 Aug 2026, 19:02
5,182
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:59
5,182
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.72%
avg views ÷ 5,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
248
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
29 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
6,948
Reactions total
31
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
61.3%
🎉
5
16.1%
🔥
5
16.1%
⚡
1
3.23%
🤯
1
3.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💎 Udemy Personal Plan — 30 DIAS GRÁTIS
Como conseguir (passo a passo):
1 - Acesse a página oficial da oferta: indeed.com/job-search-services/udemy
Ou clique no link “See the jobs / Sign up”, que direciona para udemy.com/partner/indeed.
2 - Crie uma conta ou faça login — você precisa ter uma conta do Indeed (eles verificam se você é um candidato real a vagas).
Você NÃO precisa estar se candidatando ativamente a v…
✅Como usar o N8n ilimitado por $0
É um método complexo, então aqui está o vídeo que eu encontrei explicando como configurá-lo!
🔗Link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YP6OtS5kqdWWEyc2r3OXzIXxv3PYYPnd?usp=sharing
👾Retrato Feminino com Luz Quente e Natural
Um retrato íntimo e realista com iluminação suave e textura de pele autêntica.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🤩 Deseja obter um retrato como este com a sua própria foto? Use o prompt abaixo:
3:4 竖版,单张独立图片,不要拼图、网格、文字。暖色居家写实人像摄影,腰部以上半身构图,人物身体呈三分之二侧面,头部转向镜头,轻微俯拍,浅景深。
一位明确成年的年轻东亚女性,鹅蛋脸,窄而柔和的下颌线,深棕杏眼,细致眼线,挺直鼻梁,饱满橘粉色水光唇。身体侧向画面右侧,左侧肩膀更靠近镜头,头部回转看向镜头,视视清醒而克制,嘴唇轻微分开,表情安静、自信,带轻微距离感。
一只手抬起轻搭在锁骨与上胸口位置,…
⚡️PROMOÇÃO VOLTOU, APROVEITEM!
🤖 GEMINI PRO 18 Meses – IA PREMIUM SEM LIMITES
Isso não é gasto. É o que separa quem usa IA de quem realmente produz com ela.
🔵 O que você desbloqueia:
♦️ Acesso ao Gemini Pro por 18 meses
♦️ 5 TB de armazenamento inclusos
♦️ Recursos premium de IA liberados
♦️ Ideal para estudos, trabalho e criação de conteúdo
🔥 O que muda pra você:
💙Respostas mais inteligentes e completas
💙 Raci…
💰Baixe gratuitamente — utilize um dos links alternativos:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/fx1qzvda8tv37li/Lazy+Jack.pdf/file
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LM3j5wIX5qc3tYD_KxAr8Z4rNa5E2YLb/view?usp=sharing
🛡Análise do Vírus Total
📱 Ganhe dinheiro no YouTube sem um canal — Método "Lazy Jack" (Resumo gratuito de 17 páginas)
O segredo não é fazer vídeos — você aluga o público de um criador e divide as vendas.
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @littledemonofc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 695,280 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕷𝖎𝖙𝖙𝖑𝖊 𝕯𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖓” (@littledemonofc), 5,256 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/littledemonofc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.