Channel
@listingwiseme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,180subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002069968970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @listingwiseme |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/listingwiseme |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 1,180 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 1,183 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 1,188 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 1,188 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (13 March 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 115 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
96 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 54.2% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 13.5% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We usually see the best part, but not the journey behind it Any investor can find themselves in this situation Yesterday I had a call with a VC investor, and they were one of the first to invest in ByteDance. "It's probably our best investment," he said Sounds impressive - and yeah, it's the kind of story everyone wants to hear, the kind that inspires people But as we kept talking, I realized that behind that one…
❤3💯2🔥2
My best deal was made 1 year ago And here's what I regret most Nothing. Not a single thing. It was the best day of my life Was it the right decision? One of those decisions where you just know - this is your person, and you're going to be with her. No doubts at all I remember reading some interesting idea in a book: Taleb's rule - if you need more than one reason to do something, don't do it. And man, was that s…
❤17❤🔥2👍2
Want your business to run on digital dollars - not legacy banking rails? Oobit is a corporate treasury on USDT: 💵 Hold & receive USD digitally 🌐 Pay vendors & teams in 180+ countries 💳 Corporate cards with spending controls 🤖 AI expense management ⚡️ Onboarding in ~48 hours One dashboard instead of banks, cards, and spreadsheets. DM me for more info
👍2
Quick update on MEXC MEXC are going to increase listing price after 20th of May from $60k to $100k Send me DM to get 60k offer @yoloitaly
😁6❤2🤯2👍1
Seems that this dude have new account Be careful
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
This guy is a scammer, be careful 🙏 @vivyndee1 @yoram102
👍10❤5
(The rest of the story) We arrived at a business center, went up to the right floor where their office was, and I have to say - I was impressed, because the office was stunning, you could clearly see this company had money We walk in, a staff member greets us, I explain the situation and say I want to speak to the manager - to which she tells me he stepped out 5 minutes ago and will be back in 2 hours, I said we'd w…
❤2👍1
How a Realtor Almost Scammed Us Out of $1,000 This is a brutal story and I had to use every negotiation skill I had to get our money back It all started a month and a half ago My wife and I came to Turkey for the winter, because Russia is freezing cold this time of year When we arrived in Turkey, we checked into a hotel for a few days so we could explore the city and find an apartment to live in for the next 3 mo…
❤1😁1
Congrats LUKSO 👏 https://x.com/lukso_io/status/2036478247148335570
❤4
I read a post by Russell Hammond this morning and couldn't scroll past it. He wrote about delayed identity — waiting to become the person you want to be, instead of just being them now. It hit me harder than I expected. For years I told myself: "I'll enjoy the work when the company is bigger. When the clients are bigger. When the numbers are bigger." Meanwhile, I already had clients I genuinely loved working with…
🔥4❤2
They lost $80K in 24 hours. After the listing. No MM plan. No liquidity locked. Pump on announcement, dump on open. Community and LPs got rekt. The project didn’t "fail" — the launch did. Listing is not the finish line. It’s the starting gun. Have liquidity, MM, and a plan before you announce. DM @yoloitaly to get a free consultation on your project or the Pre-TGE Checklist.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @listingwiseme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,788 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@listingwiseme named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Paul | ListingWise.me” (@listingwiseme), 1,180 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/listingwiseme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.