Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 林沐沐🎀的朋友圈

Channel

林沐沐🎀的朋友圈

@linmumu25

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,958subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002854115043
TypeChannel
Username@linmumu25
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live1 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/linmumu25

Growth

1,9051,9581,931.518 September 2026 — 1,905 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,905 subscribers1 October 2026 — 1,958 subscribers18 September 20261 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 12 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,897–1,966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 08:591,958+53
18 Sept 2026, 22:221,905no change
18 Sept 2026, 21:471,905first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.1%
avg views ÷ 1,958 subscribers
Avg views / post
648
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.807%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held18 (13 June 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total1,943
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8080.0%
🔥1111.0%
👍99.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 01:37 UTC867 views8 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

日复一日的努力 能换来你的喜欢吗💕

👍8

15 Sept 2026, 00:50 UTC828 viewsread 18 September 2026

【艺名】: 林沐沐 【价格】: 3000pp(120分钟) 【位置】: 闵行区靠近徐汇 【联系方式】: @shigebaobao2 【身材样貌】: 身材比上次还要翘了,老师有在健身,简直梨形身材,前凸后翘的 【服务过程】:二刷了,玩儿了很多次,老师是我第一个返场二刷的,大蟒🐍,服务该有的都有,不喊停吻不停,直接搞到断气,简直了。爱爱过程也很到位,哼哼唧唧的,爽到了直接颤抖高潮了。聊天也很到位,情商高,话不落地,让人休息过程中很舒服,喝了还问你喝什么,老师健身,喝的都很健康的气泡水。总结就是很好,那儿那儿都好,让人飘飘欲仙,腿抖着出教室的 标签: @shigebaobao2 #林沐沐 1500p #闵行 点击跳转原始报告【需先加群】 反馈狼友: hututu 时间:2026-08-25 16:20:04 报告ID:17692 当前进度:1/100

29 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC≈2,240 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026

【艺名】:林沐沐 【价格】:1500p 【位置】:闵行靠近徐汇 【联系方式】:@shigebaobao2 【身材样貌】:人照一致,本人更好看,胸B左右,梨形身材 【服务过程】:第二次来沐沐老师这里,小区很好找,无门禁和楼禁。时隔三月,沐沐多了一袭红发,妆容仍是那么自然,说话轻身细语。寒暄了会儿便一起去洗浴,印入眼帘便是沐沐标准的梨形身材,尤其是那丰满的臀部,让我期待后面的战斗。沐沐仔细给我清洗身体,szx也是一绝,低头望着沐沐如此投入,差点就缴械投降。 躺到床上,对面依然是一面全身镜,qqny这次选择了一件白丝。将沐沐一把搂过来,吻在一起。沐沐的舌吻对得起大蟒蛇的称号,主动向你进攻,两个人完全投入进去。服务种类不多但胜在每一样都精益求精。 戴套开战,cjs一边抽插一边舌吻,沐沐反馈自然表情迷离。切换到后入,对着全身镜,沐沐身子压得极低,蜜桃臀高高翘起在二弟面前,令人血脉喷张。屌感更佳,从镜中望见沐沐也一直看着镜子,看着我们的一举…

❤2

27 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC≈1,920 views0 reactionsread 18 September 2026

@shigebaobao2 二刷林沐沐 再次见面,沐沐依旧温柔可人。妹子换了工作室,但是依旧干净整洁。妹子丰满了一些,自述开始恢复锻炼,目前处于增肌阶段,脱衣服一看肉都在该长的地方,屁股更大更诱人了。陪浴szx后,回卧室依旧是大蟒蛇,妹子下面刮了毛,粉粉嫩嫩的尤其可口。为了防止像上一次一样女上被秒,这次后入起手,视觉效果真的爆炸,大屁股又软又弹又翘,同时还有惊人的腰臀比,尝试好几个姿势后,最后还是让妹子用最拿手的女上,抱着妹子,看着镜子里上下纷飞的大屁股,忍不住一泄如注。 总结:妹子长肉后整个身子抱着软软的,我的评价是绝对的实战利器,夯

5 Aug 2026, 02:39 UTC≈3,740 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026

【艺名】: 林沐沐 【价格】: 2500pp 【位置】: 闵行区靠近徐汇 【联系方式】: @shigebaobao2 【身材样貌】: 【艺名】: 林沐沐 【价格】: 2500pp 【位置】: 闵行区靠近徐汇 【联系方式】: @shigebaobao2 【身材样貌】: 林沐沐ls人照无差,气质出挑。身高一米七二左右,身材匀称,腰臀比极佳;翘臀丰满软糯,手感很好,揉之欲化。服务细致周到,床上热情似火,事后温柔知性,反差极致。硬件与软件皆属上乘,值得一试。 【服务过程】: “长夏幽居景不穷,花开芳砌翠成丛。午后风和新雨晴,绿莎细软不妨行。”上海的夏天总是来得很快,虫鸣伴着热风拨弄着内心的悸动。午后的阵雨带走了人间热浪,却带不走心中的欲火难平。这日俗务告一段落,心头忽生涟漪,便与沐沐约了下午相见。 沐沐ls的课室在一处高档小区,无门禁,出入友好。跟随指引到达课室,ls已在门内等候。(课室环境很好,从地毯、落地镜和打光灯的排布可以…

❤5

3 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC≈3,080 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

最近收到哥哥们的夸夸有点多呀 开心🥰

❤7

29 Jul 2026, 00:52 UTC≈3,690 views6 reactionsread 18 September 2026

不怎么写评价,今天破个例,因为值得。 林沐沐老师 @shigebaobao2 在我的购物车里有一段时间了,最后是看到了群里大佬的安利,才决定出手,不巧碰上ls上次开课的末期,课已售完,不得已错过。前天看到了ls再次回沪开课的消息,于是第一时间约课。只能说名不虚传,后悔没有早点见,真的是我电报cj以来遇到过最满意的女孩。 约课的时候就能感觉到沐沐十分热情,我比较在意细节,约课前有先咨询一下的习惯,沐沐没有一丝不耐烦,尽数认真解答,令人十分安心,于是欣然约课。 驱车前往上课地点,沐沐给出的上门指示非常详细,甚至还包含了推荐的出行方式和停车位置,感觉真的是个很认真在开课的女孩。gzs的质量和布置则是我目前见过最好的,还没有开始上课就已经展示了诸多加分项,不断拔高期待。 终于见到沐沐,不得不说本人比照片要好看不少,妆容精致,面带微笑,落落大方,完全没有感觉到cj有时会遇到那种偷偷摸摸,给人一种别样的舒适和松弛。四目相对,那温柔的…

❤6

14 Jul 2026, 02:22 UTC≈4,580 views8 reactionsread 18 September 2026

【艺名】: 林沐沐 【价格】: 1500p 【位置】: 闵行区靠近徐汇 【联系方式】: @shigebaobao2 【身材样貌】: 10 【服务过程】:即将远行,再见故人。 已经记不清来了多少次,每次依然很激动。一切都是那么自然,嘴唇紧紧贴在一起,彼此吮吸,原始的欲望呼之欲出。最喜欢看着正对🛏️的镜子,沐沐撅着蜜桃臀,吮吸着二弟,房间中又响起了靡靡之音,此起彼伏连绵不绝。 女上的姿势大有讲究,沐沐深谙此道,上下运动的轨迹完全就是顺着JJ勃起的角度,且由慢至快,看着JJ在阴道中进进出出,恍惚间竟有岛国爱情动作片的片场拍摄的感觉,二弟又暴涨一圈。 这是自由的感觉,这是飞翔的感觉。 双手扶住依依的腰,终于让JJ整根没入,狠狠撞击沐沐的大臀,活塞运动十几下之后一泻千里。两人紧紧相拥,此时两个人紧促的呼吸似乎是对彼此的表现给出了满分的评价。一次酣畅淋漓的出击🤜。

❤8

10 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC≈4,350 views10 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

快要休息啦😘😘 我不允许你还没约到我哟

❤6🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @linmumu25. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“林沐沐🎀的朋友圈” (@linmumu25), 1,958 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linmumu25.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.