Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,541–8,407 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 12:41
7,835
-70
12 Sept 2026, 13:17
7,905
-69
8 Sept 2026, 09:36
7,974
-68
3 Sept 2026, 14:20
8,042
-61
31 Aug 2026, 06:23
8,103
-73
27 Aug 2026, 22:58
8,176
-131
24 Aug 2026, 19:17
8,307
+666
21 Aug 2026, 03:16
7,641
-23
17 Aug 2026, 18:54
7,664
-106
14 Aug 2026, 20:24
7,770
-58
11 Aug 2026, 10:22
7,828
-79
8 Aug 2026, 15:43
7,907
-34
7 Aug 2026, 19:17
7,941
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:05
7,941
first reading
Engagement
223 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.65%
avg views ÷ 7,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
208
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 223 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
223 (6 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
26,808
Reactions total
452
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 53s
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
726 reactions across 185 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
277
38.2%
👍
264
36.4%
🤣
31
4.27%
👎
28
3.86%
😁
25
3.44%
🔥
20
2.75%
🖕
17
2.34%
👏
14
1.93%
💩
14
1.93%
🤡
10
1.38%
🤬
10
1.38%
🫡
5
0.689%
🍌
4
0.551%
👌
4
0.551%
🤔
2
0.275%
💔
1
0.138%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 186 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 726 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سربسته بگویم؛
با پیام امشب رهبری، به نظر من باید منتظر تحولات مهمی در سیاست داخلی و اقتصاد سیاسی مملکت باشیم.
اما یک هشدار:
مهمترین اتفاق لزوماً همان چیزی نیست که این روزها همه دربارهاش حرف میزنند.
به نظرم، تحولات اصلی میتواند سریعتر و غافلگیرکنندهتر از انتظار افکار عمومی خودش را نشان دهد.
فعلاً بیشتر از این نمیگویم.
چند روز آینده را دقیق نگاه کنید؛ ممکن است آنچه خواهیم دید، هنوز تیتر اول نشده باشد.
📢 شروع تبادلات کانال
دوستان عزیز، برای رشد مجموعه و بیشتر دیده شدن کانال تصمیم گرفتیم از امروز تبادلات رو شروع کنیم. 🚀
ممنون از همراهی و حمایت همیشگیتون ❤️
با هم رشد میکنیم 🚀
🏠 ایران پر از خانهست؛ پس چرا ما خونه نداریم؟!
یک تناقض عجیب در بازار مسکن ایران:
تعداد واحدهای مسکونی حتی از تعداد خانوارها بیشتر است؛ اما خریدن یا حتی اجارهکردن خانه برای خیلیها تبدیل به رؤیا شده.
پس مشکل کجاست؟
خانه کم داریم یا پولِ خانه نداریم؟
مهندس علی اوشانی در این ۱۰ اسلاید، یک تناقض مهم بازار مسکن را باز میکند؛ تناقضی که با «بیشتر بسازیم» بهتنهایی حل نمیشود.
این مطلب را ببینید و برای کسی بفرستید ک…
خب تکلیف دارایی مردم چی میشه؟
هر جهش ارزی برای مردم، پیامد واقعی توی زندگی و کسب و کار و سفره شون داره
اما برای بالاترین سطح تصمیمگیری اقتصادی چه صورتحسابی صادر میشه؟
اینجاست که کار از «مدیریت بد» گذشته و به «بحران پاسخگویی» رسیده.
اگه یه ساختار سالم باشه، قدرت، بدون مسئولیت معنا نداره.
اما وقتی نتیجه سیاستها در زندگی مردم ظاهر میشه و الزاماً به پایان عمر مدیریتی اون تصمیمگیرنده ی تاثیرگذار منجر نمیشه…
.
چرا بعضی از مدیرا توی ایران عزل میشن، ولی حذف نمیشن؟
چرا وزیری که مجلس برکنارش کرد، امروز دوباره سکان نهادی رو در دست داره که تصمیماتش مستقیماً با ارزش پول ملی گره خورده؟
چجوری دوباره جفت شیش میاره برمیگرده تو بازی؟
کی باید هزینه کارنامه ناموفق یه مدیر اقتصادی رو تعیین کنه؟
مجلس؟ دولت؟ نهادهای نظارتی؟
اگر هیچکدوم شون نمیتونن جلوی بازتولید مدیران پرهزینه رو بگیرن، عزل چه معنایی داره؟
شاید بحران اصلی اق…
مارپیچ دروغ
یه الگوی تکراری تو سیاست ارزی ایران شکل گرفته:
وعده ثبات، بعدش جهش ارز، بعدش توضیح و توجیه، دوباره وعده.
و همتی یکی از چهرههایی ست که در چند مقطع مهم این چرخه حضور داشته.
تو دوره قبلی ریاستش بر بانک مرکزی، ایران جهشهای سنگین ارزی رو تجربه کرد.
تو دوره ی وزارت ش، دلار از محدوده ۵۸ هزار تومن به بالای ۹۰ هزار تومن رسید و همین جهش ارزی یکی از مهمترین محورهای استیضاحش شد؛ استیضاحی که در نهایت باعث…
این نمودار رو ببینین
روغن و چربیها نسبت به سال قبل ۲۵۸٪، شیر و پنیر و تخم مرغ ۱۶۳٪ و گوشت قرمز ۱۴۴٪ تورم نقطهبهنقطه ثبت کردن.
یعنی تو بعضی از بخش ها، قیمتها ۲۰ یا ۳۰ درصد نه، بیشتر از دو برابر شده.
این نمودار داره نشون میده چطور تورم، طبقه متوسط رو ذرهذره از مصرفکننده ی محصولات داره به حذفکننده تبدیل میکنه.
طبقه ی متوسط جامعه اول برند ارزونتر میخرن، بعد مقدار خریدشون رو کمتر میکنن
آخرش هم چاره ای …
اخیرا سنتکام اعلام کرده که
روزانه ۷۵۰ میلیون بشکه نفت خام رو از تنگه هرمز خارج کرده.
موسسه HFI با اشاره به خبر منچاوسینت نوشته:
«هیس… سنتکام خبر ندارد که ارقامی که درباره نفت اعلام میکند، نفت ایران را هم شامل میشود.»
پ.ن: این بده، موسسه HFI به سنتکام تیکه انداخته که نفت ایران رو از تنگه نجات دادین
Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @line_tahlil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
با این حساب بنظرتون آمریکای ۱۹۴۵ هنوزم همون قدرت رو داره که دوباره با بمب اتم بخواد جایگاه خودش رو تثبیت کنه؟؟
بله معلومه که داره16%
دیگه نه، هژمون جهان از حالت تک قطبی داره خارج میشه84%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لاین تـحـلیـــل” (@line_tahlil), 7,835 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/line_tahlil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.