红休啦~休息期间不上线咯🥳

Channel
北北の小森林🌳
@linbei11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,690subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003791859153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @linbei11 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/linbei11 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 4,690 | -22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 4,712 | -51 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 4,763 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 4,762 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 71.3%
- avg views ÷ 4,690 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,340
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 16,720 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 #地区 学生留名: Jason 学生电报号: @jasonthemaster 上课时间: 2026-7上旬某一天 老师花名: #林小北 老师电报号: @Lin_xiaobei 上课花费: 14p 老师质量: 人照相符 10分,服务态度 9 分,服务技能 9 分,情绪价值 9 分 ,环境卫生 10 分, ( PS: 按照1到10打分 ) 服务内容: 🐍XCZ 上课过程: 小北性格算是青春美少女了, 一进门会来贴贴抱抱那种. 小北也比较喜欢前戏,一边聊,一边啃, 一边进入状态. 去了不止一次了,小北的课室环境都比较不错,干净, 安静,会有认真的摆放东西烘托气氛. 全身镜是标配,萌萌的脸配上长腿和大熊, 站立后入的感受还是比较特别的, 绝对值得一试. 小北的课室都是自…
想我了就给我打电话,我是不会接的~😏
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 #南山 学生留名: #杰伊达皮 学生电报号: @DapenIs 上课时间: 7.25 老师花名: #林小北 老师电报号: @Lin_xiaobei 上课花费: 1400p 老师质量: 人照相符10分,服务态度10分,服务技能9.5分,情绪价值10分 ,环境卫生9.5分,有无陪洗:有 ( PS: 按照1到10打分 ) 服务内容:详见课表 上课过程: 台风天,出击天,约到了小北,怎么都要风雨无阻。一进门就满眼只剩小北了,心里也被填得满满的,映入眼帘的是穿着lo装的小北,实在是太可爱了。小北把被迷的三魂不见七魄的我牵到沙发上。小北很黏人,从沙发亲热得心满意足到洗净身体再到床上一直要亲亲要抱抱,实在是太可爱了。大蟒蛇又纠缠了一会儿,小北开始亲我的身体,触电的感觉瞬间每一寸角落,至尊骨一下弹起又硬三…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】(https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #(天河区) 【优势】颜值高身材好,情绪价值高 【劣势】无 【妹子花名】:#林小北 【联系方式】:@Lin_xiaobei 【妹子年龄】:22 【验证留名】:huang 【验证时间】:5.17 【修车水费】:2400pp 【颜值】: 颜值评分: 14分(满分15分) 【身材】: 身材评分: 14分(满分15分) 【服务态度】: 服务评分: 15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:爱答不理/正常交流/沟通愉快 情绪评分: 15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排是否合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:不符合价位/符合价位/超出价位 价位评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事有无清洗,课室干净整洁方便停车 环境评分: 1…
羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】( https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #(xx区) 【优势】各方面都挺好,听话懂事,善解人意。 【劣势】无 【妹子花名】:#小北 【联系方式】:@Lin_xiaobei 【妹子年龄】:未知 【验证留名】:张无忌 【验证时间】:5.18 【修车水费】:p 【颜值】:甜美少女 颜值评分: 14分(满分15分) 【身材】:大奶萝莉,前凸后翘 身材评分: 14分(满分15分) 【服务态度】:满分 服务评分: 15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:满分 情绪评分: 15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:超出价位 价位评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:环境不错,卫生干净 环境评分: 10分(满分10分) 【额外加分项】:音乐品味不错 额…
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 #南山 学生留名: #新一 上课时间: 05.15 老师花名: #林小北 老师电报号: @Lin_xiaobei 上课花费: p 老师质量: 人照相符9分,服务态度9分,服务技能 9分,情绪价值10分 ( PS: 按照1到10打分 ) 服务内容: 见课表 上课过程: 三返小北,原本约好的课临时有事,结果改到了今天。小北见到我进门就蹦蹦跳跳跑来,贴贴抱抱亲亲,这种熟悉感真是太好,完全没有紧张感和紧迫感,也不需要担心时间的流逝,相处起来已经有了恋人的感觉。换洗后小北换上选好的jk制服,开始我们的一翻云雨,今天的状态感觉很不错,小北的技术也很完美,先是小北给我口然后我又舔了一会儿,之后又换成小北口,来回玩了好一阵起码十几分钟,小新一实在受不了了就戴上小🌂,女上、后入、镜前后入,好几个姿势轮番上阵,之后又是传教变幻了几种姿态,终于在…
#福田 #林小北 #1400P 😎 青楼已认证 🏅 #淑妃 顶级 ➡️ https://t.me/linbei11 📖 青楼认证报告 - 蔡徐坤
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 福田 验证留名: #JJ(建议用电报号署名提高可信度) 上课时间: 5.11 老师花名: #林小北 联系方式: @Lin_xiaobei 上课花费: p 老师质量: 夯 ( PS: 从服务态度、服务技能、皮肤、年龄、胸大小、身高、腿长、下面粉/黑、 屌感、情绪价值、等描述 ) 服务内容: 服务态度无敌 人工白虎 玉足 吊感无敌 情绪价值好满(第一次cj 还需慢慢对比) 上课过程: 刚下班 之前就看到群里老哥(一哥)说小北老师难约 马上火速预约小北老师 刚进来房间就看到一个漂亮的女生坐在床上面 因为是第一次出击所以感觉自己赚大了 刚坐下还没交水费 小北老师就要抱抱 交完水费以后就开始和我亲亲了 小北老师真的好香 舌头好软 亲了一小会 就领我洗澡 洗澡的时候看到小北老师的身材 挺拔的d🐻 …
优质老师出击笔记模板 【出击报告】(REPORT @SHFriendsBG ) 位置坐标: #深圳 #福田 验证留名: #宋伟华@songwei_hua 上课时间: 5.10 老师花名: #林小北 联系方式: @Lin_xiaobei 上课花费: 3500PPP 老师质量: 裸脚168 D+熊 人照一致.童颜巨乳翘臀. ( PS: 从服务态度、服务技能、皮肤、年龄、胸大小、身高、腿长、下面粉/黑、 屌感、情绪价值、等描述 ) 服务内容:课表上的都齐全 上课过程:上次约小北过去差不多1个月.这次提前获知小北回来.提前约好时间到达.第二次见面完全没有之前的羞涩.进门后主动拥抱亲亲.坐着一起谈天说地.说着说着会突然给你一个亲吻.让人感觉就像一个满眼是你的小迷妹.陪浴时会提出让你帮她清洗.一寸寸抚摸她的身体.回到床上享受着小北的服务.很少有嫩妹有这么好的口技.下面无毛白虎无异味..频繁的主动索吻…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @linbei11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,295 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北北の小森林🌳” (@linbei11), 4,690 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linbei11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.