Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 39 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,334–3,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 05:39
3,344
-2
11 Sept 2026, 22:17
3,346
-2
7 Sept 2026, 11:17
3,348
+4
2 Sept 2026, 08:39
3,344
+2
30 Aug 2026, 13:44
3,342
+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:38
3,341
-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:03
3,343
+3
14 Aug 2026, 18:04
3,340
+2
11 Aug 2026, 04:21
3,338
+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:00
3,336
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:54
3,336
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,480 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,215
54.1%
🔥
2,431
21.2%
👍
1,180
10.3%
🥰
875
7.62%
😁
603
5.25%
🤩
101
0.88%
👏
41
0.357%
🤔
10
0.087%
👎
8
0.07%
😱
6
0.052%
😢
4
0.035%
🤬
3
0.026%
🤯
3
0.026%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 4 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На время консервации Травяного перебралась на другой кордон Кроноцкого заповедника —Семячик. Здесь картинка совсем другая — вместо привычных взору вулканов и озера с медведями, совсем близко шумит Тихий океан и вулканы совсем другие. Медведи тоже встречаются, правда значительно реже, чем на Курильском озере, но я, по привычке, боюсь оставить какую-нибудь вещь без присмотра. Опыт давно научил этого не делать!))
Смотрю я на это видео, и в душе моей что-то поднимается! Долго думала, стоит ли показывать его людям? Ведь гневные комментарии от диванных экспертов будут мне обеспечены!
Но удержаться труднее, чем я представляла, ведь это видео, созданное моим другом Александром с помощью ИИ, в точности передает мое отношение к медведям! Разве, что без объятий пока обходимся!))
В начале октября архипелаг Саманг, состоящий из многочисленных островов вулканического происхождения, является самым красивым местом на Курильском озере. Осень здесь смотрится по-особенному. Разнообразие трав добавляет к желтизне берез целую палитру красок.
Медвежата Чернушки выглядят просто великолепно! Густая и длинная зимняя шерсть прибавляет им визуально с десяток килограмм. Медвежата сыты и довольны, а их мать продолжает рыбачить, чтобы накопить побольше жира и без проблем пережить в берлоге суровую зиму.
В Южно-Камчатском заказнике тоже есть свой зоопарк, только посетители в нем не люди, а медведи. В устье самой большой реки на Курильском озере стоит клетка, в которую приходят люди, чтобы безопасно наблюдать за медведями. На этот раз получилось наоборот — любопытная и вездесущая Глаша решила получше рассмотреть, кого сегодня показывают?))
На кордоне в этом году нашествие полёвок. Горностай сыт и доволен, но все равно решил попробовать на зуб мои ботинки. Почему-то я не удивилась. Горностай — это один из самых бесстрашных животных. Думаю, что если увеличить его хотя бы до размеров собаки, он стал бы гораздо опаснее медведя.))
На видео медведица, в погоне за рыбой, приблизилась слишком близко к Чернушке с медвежатами. Та не замедлила сообщить, что больше так делать не стоит. Нарушение личного пространства медведя — главная причина всех проблем в медвежьем мире.
Интересно, что та же Чернушка сама подходит к людям довольно близко, не видя никакой опасности для себя и своих медвежат.
❤348👍87🔥44🥰28😁4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lianavaravskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@lianavaravskaya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@yana_yakunova named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liana Varavskaya” (@lianavaravskaya), 3,344 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lianavaravskaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
