Channel
@liaart_nett
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,801subscribers
-289 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001052569388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liaart_nett |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liaart_nett |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@liaart_nett was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 10,801 | -77 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 10,878 | -87 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 10,965 | +455 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 10,510 | -36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 10,546 | -26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 10,572 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 10,592 | -42 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 10,634 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 10,662 | -24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 10,686 | -30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 10,716 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 10,731 | -28 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 10,759 | -23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 10,782 | -64 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 10,846 | -38 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 10,884 | -54 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 10,938 | -29 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 10,967 | -82 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 11,049 | -80 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 11,129 | first reading |
344 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 344 (4 August 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,606 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
516 reactions across 156 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 316 | 61.2% | |
| 😍 | 50 | 9.69% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 7.36% | |
| 🤣 | 32 | 6.20% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 4.84% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 2.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 1.55% | |
| 🤷♀ | 8 | 1.55% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 1.36% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.969% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.775% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.581% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.194% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 180 of the 344 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 660 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
و اگه شما هم دلتون میخواد این مسیر رو شروع کنید و ببینید تا کجا میتونید پیش برید، از همین امروز شروع کنید. 🎨🤍 هر سؤالی هم دربارهی شاخههای هنری و آموزشها دارید، میتونید به پشتیبانی پیام بدید تا راهنماییتون کنن. 🫶🏻✨ @quipiche
👍3❤1👏1
چند ماه دیگه برگردید و دوباره نگاهش کنید... اون موقع احتمالاً خودتون اولین نفری هستید که میگید: «وای... من چقدر پیشرفت کردم! 🥹» و اون لحظه واقعاً میارزه به تمام غر زدنهایی که سر اون نقاشی کردید. 👩🏻🎨🎨
❤3
حالا من یه پیشنهاد دارم🥹🤍 از امروز هر نقاشیای که میکشید رو نگه دارید؛ حتی اگه فکر میکنید الان اصلاً خوب نشده! 👀
❤1
مهم اینه که متوقف نشید. 🫶🏻 چون آخر مسیر، اون چیزی که بیشتر از سرعت مهمه، همون ادامه دادنه. 🎨✨
❤3
و یه چیزی رو هم یادتون باشه؛ قرار نیست همه با یه سرعت پیش برن. 🤍 یکی خیلی سریع دستش راه میفته، یکی زمان بیشتری لازم داره🌿 یکی روزی چند ساعت تمرین میکنه و یکی با کلی مشغله فقط روزی نیم ساعت وقت داره.🤎
❤1
و به نظرم یکی از قشنگترین لحظههای نقاشی دقیقاً همینه. 🤍 لحظهای که چشمت جزئیات بیشتری میبینه، دستت کنترل بیشتری داره و چیزی که توی ذهنت تصور میکنی، کمکم میتونی روی کاغذ پیادهش کنی. 🎨✨ اونجاست که میفهمی تمام اون ساعتهایی که فکر میکردی «دارم الکی تمرین میکنم» واقعاً داشتن نتیجه میدادن. 🥹
تا اینکه یه روز رسیدن به جایی که خودشون به نقاشیشون نگاه کردن و گفتن: «صبر کن... اینو واقعاً من کشیدم؟! 😳🥹»
👏5
اشتباه کردن، پاک کردن، دوباره کشیدن، غر زدن، دوباره آموزش دیدن و باز برگشتن سر نقاشی...👩🏻🎨💕 گاهی فکر میکردن هیچ پیشرفتی نکردن، ولی هر بار یه ذره بهتر شدن. ✏️🤍
بعد کمکم تمرین کردن، اشتباه کردن، دوباره کشیدن و ادامه دادن... و یه روز رسیدن به جایی که خودشون از نتیجه کارشون تعجب کردن. 🎨🥹
👏3
ولی بین همه این حرفا یه چیز واقعاً جالبه. 🤍 همین آدمایی که امروز سر یه ابرو ممکنه نیم ساعت حرص بخورن...💆🏻♀️ یه روزی بودن که حتی فکر نمیکردن بتونن یه چهره درست بکشن.🥹🌿
تمرین کنید، اشتباه کنید، دوباره امتحان کنید و اجازه بدید کمکم بهتر بشید. 🎨🫶🏻 گاهی فقط لازمه به جای اینکه مدام دنبال ایراد کارتون باشید... یه لحظه به عقب نگاه کنید و ببینید چقدر از روز اول جلوتر اومدید. 🥹✨
📩 استاد من وقتی کارم تموم میشه، به جای اینکه خوشحال باشم، میرم یه ایراد جدید ازش پیدا میکنم که دوباره دستکاریش کنم🥲 👩🏻🎨 کمالگرایی دقیقاً همینه! 💆🏻♀️✨️ ولی به خودتون باور داشته باشید، قرار نیست از همون اول همهچی بینقص باشه.
Showing the 12 most recent of 344 posts we hold for @liaart_nett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش نقاشی با لیا” (@liaart_nett), 10,801 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liaart_nett.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.