Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LGBTQ Consciousness(GIG) Gay Group delhi

Channel

LGBTQ Consciousness(GIG) Gay Group delhi

@lgbtconciousness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,803subscribers

-137 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169471705
TypeChannel
Username@lgbtconciousness
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lgbtconciousness

Growth

2,8032,9402,871.57 August 2026 — 2,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,940 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,934 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,917 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,864 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,848 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,830 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,819 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,803 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 25 days, net -137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,782–2,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 07:472,803-16
29 Aug 2026, 08:052,819-11
26 Aug 2026, 08:262,830-18
23 Aug 2026, 06:062,848-16
19 Aug 2026, 17:232,864-14
16 Aug 2026, 21:332,878-20
13 Aug 2026, 22:292,898-19
10 Aug 2026, 20:562,917-17
8 Aug 2026, 01:512,934-6
7 Aug 2026, 13:322,940no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:322,940first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14880.4%
👍3016.3%
👏42.17%
💯10.543%
🥰10.543%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2026, 18:33 UTC≈7,840 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GayIndiaChannelPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

26👏2

31 Dec 2025, 18:30 UTC≈42,400 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌈✨ Hello 2026 — From GIG & Team to all of you✨🌈 New year. New energy. Same beautiful rainbow family 💖 This space is made of real people, real stories, real courage, and a whole lot of love. Whether you’re loud or quiet, out or still finding your way — you belong here. In 2026, let’s promise to: 🌟 Celebrate each other’s wins 🌟 Be gentle on hard days 🌟 Protect this space as a safe one 🌟 Love without limits and suppo

18👍1

21 Dec 2025, 17:54 UTC≈17,700 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 SAFETY ALERT – PLEASE READ 🚨 There have been real cases where people met someone from online platforms and were assaulted, robbed, raped, or threatened. In some cases, the person was not alone. These are serious crimes. This message is to protect you. ⚠️ BEFORE MEETING ANYONE • Do a live video call (no excuses) • Verify recent photos + voice • First meet in a public place • Share live location with someone y

13👍2

1 Dec 2025, 17:55 UTC≈20,300 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏳️‍🌈 Being Gay Is NOT a Disease! 🏳️‍🌈 Fact: Top global medical organizations (including the WHO) confirm being gay is a natural part of human diversity—not an illness, disorder, or problem. Myths vs. Truths: ❌ Myth: “Being gay is a choice.” ✅ Truth: Sexual orientation isn’t chosen—it’s how you’re born. ❌ Myth: “Gay people need curing.” ✅ Truth: There’s NO valid cure—efforts to change orientation are dangerous and

33

8 Oct 2025, 02:27 UTC≈18,600 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hey Gigians 🌈, कृपया इसे ध्यान से पढ़ें — यह बहुत ज़रूरी है। हाल ही में कुछ लोग इस कम्युनिटी के सदस्यों की निजी जानकारी और तस्वीरें शेयर कर रहे हैं, खासकर तब जब उनकी किसी से बात बंद हो जाती है या मनमुटाव होता है। इन पोस्ट्स में परिवार की तस्वीरें, माता-पिता के नंबर, और निजी जानकारियाँ भी शामिल हैं। 💬 यह सिर्फ़ ड्रामा नहीं है — यह हैरासमेंट (उत्पीड़न) है और भारतीय कानून के तहत सज़ा-योग्य साइबर क्राइम है (आईटी एक्ट 6

11👍4💯1🥰1

8 Oct 2025, 01:46 UTC≈15,800 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hey GIGians 🌈, please read this carefully — it’s serious. Recently, a few people have been sharing personal info and pictures of others from this community after falling out or stopping communication. Some of these posts even include family photos, parents’ numbers, and private details. 💬 This isn’t just drama — it’s harassment and a punishable cybercrime under Indian law (IT Act 66E, 67, and IPC 499-500). If some

5👍2

18 Aug 2025, 18:09 UTC≈10,500 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👋 Hi GIGians Did you know that in ancient India, before colonial laws, sexuality and gender were seen with much more openness? Same-sex love and queer identities weren’t stigmatized the way they were later. ✨ Cultural & Religious Context • The Kama Sutra described male–male love. • The Mahabharata & Puranas told stories of gender change (like Shikhandi & Arjuna as Brihannala). • Temple art at Khajuraho & Konark sho

12👍1

15 Aug 2025, 00:13 UTC≈7,750 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Happy Independence Day! 🏳️‍🌈🇮🇳 15th August reminds us of the struggles for freedom — but are we truly free if prejudice still exists? This Independence Day, let’s pledge to break free from hate, stigma, and discrimination, and build a future where love and identity are celebrated, not hidden.

5

10 Aug 2025, 14:25 UTC≈10,200 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Question: 🩺 Do you get tested regularly for STIs?

  1. Yes — I stick to a regular schedule 📅26%
  2. Sometimes — depends on my situation 🤷‍♂️15%
  3. No — I haven’t in a while 😬17%
  4. I’ve never been tested 😶42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lgbtconciousness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2025, 14:25 UTCAnonymous Poll298 voters

Question: 🩺 Do you get tested regularly for STIs?

  1. Yes — I stick to a regular schedule 📅26%
  2. Sometimes — depends on my situation 🤷‍♂️15%
  3. No — I haven’t in a while 😬17%
  4. I’ve never been tested 😶42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 3 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LGBTQ Consciousness(GIG) Gay Group delhi” (@lgbtconciousness), 2,803 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lgbtconciousness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.