Channel
@lfg_meme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
48,243subscribers
-446 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002432950472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lfg_meme |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lfg_meme |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 48,243 | -47 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 48,290 | -93 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 48,383 | -54 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 48,437 | -94 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 48,531 | -49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 48,580 | -76 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 48,656 | -33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 48,689 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,591 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3,531 | 98.3% | |
| 🤯 | 60 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,591reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Murad: the path from “MOVEMENTS” to “GEMS”. In July 2025, the portfolio stood at $67M. Today, only $9.1M remains. Down 86% and -$58M in six months. But don’t worry too much about Murad, he nicely unloaded from other wallets 😌
🔥177🤯6
Buying the dip. Or maybe fuck it? 😹 For almost two years, I’ve been buying every single dump. Same phrases everywhere, every channel: “Buy when everyone is scared” “When there’s blood in the market, that’s the best time to make money” And honestly — that’s mostly bullshit. Will the market recover? Yeah, probably. But not everything. 99% of tokens exist just to get dumped on retail. And the other 1% gets pumped h…
🔥202🤯1
PUMP is no longer FUN, it’s Fund So basically, they decided to run a small IDO to fund devs — $3M total for 12 projects. And who are the judges? You. The audience. Your activity. Requirements are simple: launch a shitty token and show some activity — not for a dump (as they claim), but for a great future (yeah, sure). Long story short, the market is now betting on teams.
🔥170🤯1
Already 200 requests. Another 100 and I’m deleting the link.
🔥202🤯1
Here I’ll be sharing my wins on Polymarket and other prediction markets. https://t.me/+qOMiwAo3BKNkNzQ0
🔥171
Trump Trump Trump I’m sure they’re just fitting the news to the events, people simply don’t have that many coins to push the order book up or down like that. All of this is conspiracy and HUMERU, in reality it’s just a shitty market and a manipulative swamp. When they want — we’ll fly in a week so hard that everyone will think it’s already too late to enter, then it’ll pump for another week and our hamster brain wi…
🔥187
Do you believe in a new meme season and an alt bull run?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥198
Wake up
🔥223🤯5
Happy New Year, guys 🎄🐎 Despite the fact that expectations from crypto this year, to put it mildly, didn’t come true, there were still some wins! At least my channel is probably the only one in this fucked-up and shitty market that didn’t sell you VIPs, paid services, or other scams — but actually gave calls from which some of you managed to loot a couple of coins. Same plan for next year: if we find something that…
🔥188
🥲🥲🥲
🔥216
Around $6.7B has been bridged to Solana this year. $4B comes from ETH alone.
🔥210🤯2
No news = dump Good news = dump Bad news = dump Sell all = pump
🔥191🤯14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lfg_meme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you believe in a new meme season and an alt bull run?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 2 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 725,861 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LFG CALLS - BULL RUN” (@lfg_meme), 48,243 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lfg_meme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.