Answer:
- A17%
- B43%
- C37%
- D3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@let_us_crack_Prelims
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,331subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001555940244 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @let_us_crack_Prelims |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/let_us_crack_Prelims |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 12,331 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 12,335 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 12,348 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:08 | 12,354 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 12,354 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Answer:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Question:
😊😘heart touching
A record success rate in prelims again! So many students of EnlightIAS have cleared prelims! Details will be shared soon✌️✌️✌️
#Youngest IAS officer of this year Aastha Singh AIR 61 Was part of prelims test series cum guidance program
Amazing ✌️✌️😁 7-8 questions decide your entry for mains
✌️✌️❣ All the best for mains
This year csat will play a crucial role. Because of this, the cutoff will go down
The level of GS Paper was moderate to tough. CSAT was not easy. Cutoff will be lower than last year.
Cut off will not be High. Be happy Guys. Our team of selected experts will issue detailed analysis very soon. In past years our predictions were very accurate. Last year Many institutes predicted very high cutoff. Later, they changed it. Be careful. Be happy.. Good luck
CSAT Paper
🏁 Remaining days' Strategy for Prelims 2025 Dear Aspirants, As you stand at the edge of one of the most important milestones in your UPSC journey, here is a clear, focused and motivational plan to help you cross the finish line with confidence and clarity: ✅ 1. Prioritize Smart Revision Over New Learning Avoid the temptation to pick new books or untouched topics. Focus on what you've already covered — strengthen yo…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @let_us_crack_Prelims. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Answer:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Answer?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Answer of Above Question?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRELIMS Crack | EnlightIAS” (@let_us_crack_Prelims), 12,331 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/let_us_crack_Prelims.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.