7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,582–1,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 20:26
1,627
+32
21 Aug 2026, 00:33
1,595
+6
17 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,589
-1
14 Aug 2026, 12:46
1,590
-18
11 Aug 2026, 02:31
1,608
+20
7 Aug 2026, 22:01
1,588
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:50
1,588
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 1,627 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
80.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
19 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,174
Reactions total
3,370
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,638 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,375
29.6%
❤
1,189
25.6%
custom 5382295634860587872
489
10.5%
🕊
292
6.30%
⚡
281
6.06%
👏
266
5.74%
🏆
134
2.89%
💯
93
2.01%
❤🔥
89
1.92%
💔
89
1.92%
🗿
72
1.55%
🤓
50
1.08%
🙏
49
1.06%
🥰
47
1.01%
☃
44
0.949%
🍌
26
0.561%
🤝
22
0.474%
🤩
13
0.28%
😭
8
0.172%
🍓
6
0.129%
1 further kind
4
0.086%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leralevano. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Деньги — это одна из самых сильных энергий в нашей жизни.
Через деньги мы реализуем свои желания, создаём комфорт, развиваемся, помогаем близким и воплощаем свои планы.
Но каждый человек приходит к деньгам своим способом.
Для кого-то это:
💛 успешные сделки в бизнесе и новые клиенты;
💛карьерный рост и увеличение дохода;
💛 продажа недвижимости или другого имущества;
💛 поддержка партнёра;
— раскрытие талантов и пр…
Какой источник дохода вы хотели бы усилить или активировать в ближайшее время?
Работа30%
Бизнес40%
Активы13%
Инвестиции17%
Выплаты8%
Семья14%
Компенсации3%
Таланты22%
Возможности26%
Поддержка партнёра/ мужчины20%
The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сейчас открыты Врата Льва — период активации новых возможностей, намерений и перехода на новый уровень.
Следом, в августе 2026 года, начинается коридор затмений.
Август 2026 — особенный кармический месяц.
Всё, что вы будете делать в этот период, какие решения принимать и какие намерения закладывать, может стать основой вашего будущего.
Расписание на август:
энергоаудит и чистки с помощью воска, все места заняты.…
Родология — маркетинг или негатив?
Сегодня, как и обещала, разберем самый глубокий вид негатива — родовой.
В нашей медицинской метафоре:
— Бытовой негатив — это простуда.
— Магический — вирус извне.
— Самоблоки — психосоматика.
Родовой негатив — это генетика. То, что передалось по наследству в «КОДЕ» вашей семьи.
НО СКАЖУ ЧЕСТНО (да простят меня родологи🙏):
сейчас из родологии сделали маркетинг, хотя на самом …
Проанализировала ваши комментарии и поняла одну важную вещь...
Друзья, спасибо каждому за активность под прошлыми постами про виды негатива! Я внимательно прочитала абсолютно все ваши комментарии и мнения.
💛💛💛
Какой главный вывод я сделала?
💛💛💛
Многие вообще впервые столкнулись с этой культурой и не владеют информацией, либо владеют ею лишь частично.
НО САМОЕ ГЛАВНОЕ:
многие очень сильно заблуждаются в определении т…
4 ВИДА НЕГАТИВА,
которые портят нам жизнь. Какой управляет вами?
Часто мы списываем свои неудачи на простое невезение.
Но если заглянуть глубже, за каждым «черным крылом» в жизни стоит конкретный деструктивный механизм.
Весь негатив можно разделить на 4 основные группы.
Разбираемся, откуда прилетает и почему мы часто упускаем главное.
Выше, серия 3х красных постов я опубликовала самые активные моменты, котор…
В этом случае я могу помочь почистить финансовые каналы, привлечение удачи, фарт, НО‼️
Дорогие мои, если вы лежите на диване и ждете удачу, ни один самый мощный специалист не поднимет вас...
Если есть подозрения, что вы носитель негатива, приходите на энергоаудит, вы поймёте, что вами движет, а вот принимать решения, что дальше, уже ваша ответственность...
Я в первую очередь логик, без иллюзий!!!
В первую очередь…
‼️Вот тут ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО:
Чтобы профессионально заказать такое воздействие на высоком уровне, требуются немаленькие деньги.
Если же человек от сильной злости или зависти пытается сделать это сам, используя только интернет под рукой, там последствия вообще непредсказуемы — неизвестно, куда и кого в итоге выкинет этим рикошетом.
‼️Но мотив всегда один — человека нужно очень сильно задеть.
— Большие деньги
— Жесткая ко…
custom 538229563486058787215💔10❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @leralevano. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой источник дохода вы хотели бы усилить или активировать в ближайшее время?
Работа30%
Бизнес40%
Активы13%
Инвестиции17%
Выплаты8%
Семья14%
Компенсации3%
Таланты22%
Возможности26%
Поддержка партнёра/ мужчины20%
The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Энергия для Лидеров с Лерой Левано” (@leralevano), 1,627 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leralevano.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.