Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Живу как Хочу

Channel

Живу как Хочу

@lerachudesenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,193subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001510555549
TypeChannel
Username@lerachudesenko
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lerachudesenko

Growth

1,1931,1971,1957 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,195 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,195 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,195 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,192–1,198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 13:551,193-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:191,195-1
20 Aug 2026, 19:521,196+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:291,195-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:181,196+1
11 Aug 2026, 04:431,195-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:151,196-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:161,197first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 1,193 subscribers
Avg views / post
144
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,742
Reactions total282
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14651.8%
🔥10436.9%
🤩124.26%
👍113.90%
😁51.77%
😱41.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC103 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не совсем так. Просите то, что по-настоящему хотите, даже если это кажется невозможным. Как вот я пример с парковкой привела: да ну, можно не рассчитывать, там никогда места не бывает. А место оказалось. Так и с желаниями. Не стоит просить максимум, если вы на самом деле не хотите максимум. А вот если вы хотите максимум, но боитесь или не верите - все равно просите.

18

6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

То есть надо просить по максимуму?)

6 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC129 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Никогда не просите меньше, чем вы на самом деле хотите. Вас обязательно проучат )) Например, вам хочется чтобы мужчина был и любящий и заботливый и с деньгами. Но вы в такое не верите. Думаете: так не бывает, либо будет любящий и нормальный, либо с деньгами. И начинается торговля: господи, дай мне мужчину любящего и заботливого. Да пусть хоть на маршрутке ездит, я согласна, главное чтобы любящий был. Поверьте, вам

🔥24😁3

6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC124 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Решила начать с малого ))

4

6 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC121 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хочется: распечатывать фото того, что мне нравится Затем фотографировать уже исполнившееся, распечатывать и добавлять в тот же альбом Не знаю почему, но меня так вдохновила эта идея, хочу прямо завести такое на постоянной основе, если конечно идея выдержит проверку временем 😁 Сначала хотела купить фотоаппарат моментальной печати, типа полароид или инстакс, но пока решила взять просто принтер *хотя может быть инста

17🔥9

6 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC122 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня новая идея фикс )) Я уже недели две хожу вынашиваю идею блокнота желаний )) Что-то вроде карты желаний, только в виде блокнота )) Загорелась этим, не могу успокоиться 😁

🔥18

6 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC128 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

8

6 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC135 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

13

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lerachudesenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Живу как Хочу” (@lerachudesenko), 1,193 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lerachudesenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.