Channel
@leoclub168g
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,799subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002028454753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leoclub168g |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leoclub168g |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 4,799 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 4,820 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 4,843 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 4,843 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
$TRULL iz heer too bring gud vibe, big dreemz, and wyld meme energee Contract: 3YKAx7YEg7u3vsZYAd68gAGYpHo8Dp349P3TzsHvpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/8eyqhpdhlgx433whkgkznuyrwde9zlxsme7raocwu5tz
Aped a bag 3XHafP5M87BvqtwCYBRGvdKLQfrFtCh4wXzBQ5BKFLAG TIME TO PUSH🍀
#PENJAMIN Got a cook from a good team Narrative is nice, still low mc Let's see, anyway, dyor https://dexscreener.com/solana/6muqnea8iggfkrxkzqxg4zw4s1hrcav53nngtyvjauvk
$CLARITY is live Right now in the U.S. the Clarity Act is being discussed — a law that aims to finally bring clear rules to the crypto market: who regulates it and which assets are considered securities and which are not. Everyone starts writing about act Clarity. It's a presale cook, dyor x.com/token_clarity t.me/token_clarity Ca: 3EPZQzTfUtzY99wzMrgVN4QypHeAW7hmynrxmFbDgcTy
https://x.com/leochain0/status/2031231245653578055
https://x.com/leochain0/status/2027270442474738122
$CATCOIN comes to dip again bcz of rough market, never miss such free entry, c u at 5m in coming days
We hit almost 10x at top and $Token reversing again after retrace Ez money with leochain's call, lfg
Catcoin ($CATCOIN) – The 2013 OG Reborn! Catcoin launched in late 2013 as the very first cat-themed meme coin, created just months after Dogecoin and originally running its own proof-of-work blockchain. It carved out a dedicated following in the earliest days of altcoins and survived every market cycle since. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd7b5d68827f8a8859b135d3f86c76c43368ffed4
$BEAM has arrived Nuclear tokenization is the future, and we are paving the path forward Aped a bag, try to find ur good entry, dyor https://dexscreener.com/solana/9y3d2avzjxgezthadwhrjgxrsz7b3tym5sgmvmzcg8gr
Market is rough, especially in the weekend, save ur money
Ath after ath, wo got almost 5x from initial entry U just need is one $Token
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @leoclub168g. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,449,325 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“leoclub call” (@leoclub168g), 4,799 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leoclub168g.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.