4-7 (张)领到评论区晒一下
❤3

Channel
@lbss0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13,623subscribers
-1,363 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003816537380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lbss0 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lbss0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 13,623 | -99 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 13,722 | -313 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 14,035 | -187 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 14,222 | -376 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 14,598 | -224 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 14,822 | -164 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 14,986 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (6 July 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 15,730 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
114 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 43.0% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 21.1% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 10.5% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 7.02% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 🌭 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
4-7 (张)领到评论区晒一下
❤3
20:20分
❤7🌭5
https://t.me/lbss7 本群正在抽奖 频道明天晚上发50个🧧 关注频道信息不要错过
❤1
🎁随机空投礼包: 1.88c-888c|飞机会员|供需券|代金券等超值礼包 💰动动手赚uu,快乐翻倍! 🏠欢迎来到利币担保官方推出的TG百万空投机器人 @lbktbot 🔥玩法加成: 邀请人数越多 → 中奖次数越多 邀请人数越多 → 中奖概率越高 指定群聊天有机会被现金空投砸中 ⚠️小号 僵尸粉 耍小聪明的奖金礼品作废 😀在 @lbss7 每天签到得1分,2分可以免费拆红包🧧 👥邀请奖励 每成功邀请 2位好友,即可额外获得 1次拆红包机会,无上限!!! 👤官方投入百万U奖池持续发放,人人都有机会领取奖励!!! 📤提现规则 账户累计奖励达到 15cny即可申请提现,到账快速稳定!!! 注:必须关注官方频道,退出无效 ✨邀请人 +活跃= 额外收益 在利币官方群组发言 @lbss7 随机空投大红包🧧!!! 在享受聊天的乐趣的同时,还能获得真实奖励,让努力变得更有价值!!! 🔥每天都有机会 🔥邀请好友无限获…
🎉3❤1
很多人说没抢到下次先发包 后两位数大家准备好了 再公开后两位数 大家这样可以吗
👏8❤5
30个 6.66 6-9 李 领到评论区晒一下(不晒下次减少金额哦)
❤9
晚上20:30 30份 6.66 关注频道不要错过哦
👏13👍8😁7💩3❤2🤬2🤮2🤡1
红包🧧来了4-7 (刘) 领到了评论区发一下
❤4💩1
17:50准时发红包
❤3
红包🧧来了3-6(刘) 领到的宝子发一下到评论区
❤6🎉3
明天16:00再发10份16.66今天小弟包错了选的拼手气 没抢到的明天还有频道每天都有
❤1
来了来了防止机器人自己猜一下0-3 刘。 (领到了截图发一下到评论区)
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lbss0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 700,415 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“利币大食堂/每日红包🧧” (@lbss0), 13,623 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lbss0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.