๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โค6๐ฅ5

Channel
@lavalend
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Cite this entry
7,287subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001641035938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lavalend |
| Created | 3 June 2022 โ measured โ cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lavalend |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 7,287 | -26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 7,313 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 7,331 | -27 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 7,358 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 7,371 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 7,385 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 7,387 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 7,387 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
68 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 39 | 57.4% | |
| โค | 24 | 35.3% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 2 | 2.94% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 2 | 2.94% | |
| ๐คฉ | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โค6๐ฅ5
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โค4๐ฅฐ2๐ฅ1
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
๐ฅ7๐คฉ1
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
๐ฅ3
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โค3๐ฅ3
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
๐ฅ3โค2
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅ1
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
๐ฅ4
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โค3๐ฅ2
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
๐ฅ3โค2
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
๐ฅ3
๐LAVA๐ ๐คOur recommendation ๐ค
โค2๐ฅ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lavalend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐LAVA๐ ๐บ๐ฆSWU๐บ๐ฆโ (@lavalend), 7,287 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavalend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.