Channel
@lasofinancechannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,625subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001692968822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lasofinancechannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lasofinancechannel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 2,625 | +4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 2,621 | -7 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 2,628 | +8 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 2,620 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 2,617 | +11 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 2,606 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 2,595 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 2,591 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 2,588 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:59 | 2,584 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 2,588 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 2,599 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 2,589 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 2,591 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 2,593 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 2,587 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 2,587 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
156 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 59 | 37.8% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 23.7% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 16.0% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 7.69% | |
| 🤪 | 9 | 5.77% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 4.49% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.92% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.28% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
8/5/2026 Changelog Real-Time Banking Alerts, In-App Verification Status & Proof of Address, Clearer Deposit Tracking New Features & Improvements • Get instant notifications for key banking and wallet events, so you know the moment a transfer posts, is sent, or your balance changes. • Check your verification status in-app and upload a proof of address directly from the verification flow to speed up approval. • Depos…
❤3
Swype Update Unfortunately we have received notice that the service will not resume today. They have indicated to us that the issue is related to a migration being carried out by their banking partner and that while it was expected to be finalised today, that has not happened. Funds are safe. They have not provided an ETA for a resolution but have assured they will keep us informed as it progresses. I wish I had b…
👍6😢2
BTC deposits are currently down. We will update this announcement as soon as they are functioning normally again.
👍1
Want to catch up on the last week at Laso Finance? Check out our latest Week in Review!
❤6⚡1
Swype Update Just got this response back from Swype Founder: "Service will resume on Monday. Latest Tuesday!" We asked: 1. Will users retain their existing card information? 2. What context can you give us around the cause of this outage? Will update this announcement when we have clarity on either of those questions.
🫡11🔥3💯1
For Bug Bounty Program Participants Since the release of Anthropic's Fable model, Laso Finance has been inundated with a significant increase in bug reports. Nearly all of which are complete AI slop. However, in between the slop are submissions from our valued, legitimate security researchers. As a result, we do need to carefully review each report in detail. If you have submitted a bug bounty report, please be pat…
👍6
No Change in Swype Status Latest official response from Swype is attached and transcribed here. "Dear Customer, We are currently experiencing a temporary service interruption affecting all Swype products. As a result, all SKUs have been temporarily disabled while we work with our partners to resolve the issue. During this time, transactions, redemptions, and new card issuances may not be processed successfully. …
👍7
It's the end of another busy week for Laso Finance, with a new hire being onboarded, progress being made on our roadmap and some really cool products being built using Laso on the agentic side. If you want to get the full lowdown on the last week at Laso, check out our latest Week in Review article 👇 https://x.com/LasoFinance/status/2080754399144739012
👍3🔥2❤1🤪1
[7:38AM ET 7/24/2026] Swype Experiencing Issues Our issuing partner for Swype cards is experiencing an outage. Currently, in Swype, all balances show as $0 and cards are not showing. New cards are not loading correctly, and transactions are declining. Funds and cards are safe - Once this is resolved your Swype account and cards will be back to full working order. We are in communication with the team and they are …
👍6🤪1
I'm very excited to announce that @dan_2220, the long-time user and prolific helper in group discussion, has officially joined the Laso Finance team. If you have spent any time in this chat, I'm sure you've already seen him helping fellow users. Dan comes from Exodus Wallet, where he was the Customer Experience manager of the EMEA region, driving product-level changes from customer data and feedback. Similarly, at …
🔥16🤝7🤪1
The Swype dashboard issue is now resolved. Balances, cards, and ability to spend cards are back to operating as normal.
👍5🤪1
7/22/2026 Changelog Agentic Laso Wallets, Clear Fee Display, Easier Sign-In, New Transfer Limits New Features & Improvements • At laso.finance/agent, your agent can get its own wallet. One prompt, and your Hermes/OpenClaw gets a card, an x402-enabled EVM+Solana wallet and more. • Depositing is clearer: the QR deposit screen is now a numbered, step-by-step transfer slip with your reference details up front to reduce…
🤪1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lasofinancechannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Laso Finance” (@lasofinancechannel), 2,625 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lasofinancechannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.