Channel
@larabefruitier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,127subscribers
+96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003868601761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @larabefruitier |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/larabefruitier |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,127 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 1,130 | +25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 1,105 | +10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 1,095 | +15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 1,080 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 1,065 | +29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,036 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,031 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,916 |
| Reactions total | 182 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
320 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 320 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BINA! MA FORMATION INTENSIVE 🔗 bina.larabefruitier.com avec Rachid Ouzzi 🌳 L'ARABE FRUITIER "On le reconnait à ses fruits" Pas d'algorithme. Si tu apprécies, c'est toi qui partages !
🍓21
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
الحمد لله 1000 abonnés grâce à Allah ! Merci à tous ceux qui ont fait connaître la chaine Bienvenue à tout le monde ! 🌳 L'ARABE FRUITIER "On le reconnait à ses fruits"
🍓38
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
ALORS ? Choisis les propositions qui te concernent
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍓12
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
ATTACHE, DÉTACHE, C’EST LA TÂCHE ! 🧊 Ici, le jeu force à reconnaître, sélectionner et ordonner les lettres arabes pour reconstruire un mot complet. 📊 Il travaille simultanément la discrimination visuelle des lettres, la conscience orthographique et l’association du mot à sa traduction. 🚦Le feedback-couleur immédiat (vert/rouge) permet une correction en temps réel, pertinente dans l’acquisition de l’écriture et de …
🍓21
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
FAIS UNE EXPÉRIENCE ! 📱Dans les réglages de la «langue» de ton smartphone, choisis «ARABE» ! ⚙️ L’intérêt de cette technique est d’utiliser un vocabulaire nécessaire, en contexte réel, en profitant d’un cadre familier : l’emploi «mécanique» du smartphone au quotidien. Tu connais bien ton appareil, les habitudes restent les mêmes… Il n’y a que la langue qui change. 📦 Tu vas donc découvrir une tonne de mots nouveau…
🍓31
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
Les signes au dessus ou en dessous des lettres arabes sont des accents
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍓8
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
⬆️ شارك
🍓12
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
LIRE L’ARABE SANS VOYELLES, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE ? Clarifions d'emblée un point important... Les petits signes sur et sous les lettres arabes ne sont PAS des "accents" ! Ce sont des voyelles. 🔴 Bonne nouvelle, il n'y en a que trois. Elles tirent leurs noms du mouvement que réalise la bouche lors de leur prononciation avec la consonne. Ainsi donc, un ب avec une fatha se lira ba, car fatha signifie ouvrir la bouche. …
🍓15
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
Essayez ceci : 1. Prendre l'habitude d'écrire sans voyelles tous les mots usuels qui vous sont bien connus Une fois que vous avez appris un mot, pourquoi vous encombrer de voyelles ? La prochaine fois que vous l'écrirez, faites le sans voyelles puisque vous les maîtrisez déjà ! Ce qui vous permettra de le lire même s'il est dépouillé de toute voyelle. 1 bis - Une variante... Quand vous écrivez un mot que vous ent…
🍓24
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
IMPORTANT 🎤J'ai envie de faire un "podcast" au format long sur des questions liées à la langue arabe ! ✉️ Vous avez la possibilité de proposer les sujets qui vous intéressent vraiment : - via un message direct sur cette chaine : t.me/larabefruitier - par mail sur [email protected], écrire "PODCAST" en objet 🌳 L'ARABE FRUITIER
🍓19
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
🚀 JOUER POUR APPRENDRE ! Exemple d’un apprentissage ludique des lettres arabes. 🎮 Les ingrédients de la « gamification » sont mis au service de la pédagogie. L’intérêt est de transformer une tâche potentiellement monotone et anxiogène en une expérience active, multimodale et motivante. 🤍 Les mécanismes choisis (feedback rapide, score en progression, pression temporelle modérée, récompense sociale, possibilité de …
🍓9
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
☝🏽LA PRONONCIATION DES LETTRES DE CETTE MANIÈRE NE CONCERNE QUE LA LECTURE DU CORAN
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍓7
Signed Rachid OUZZI رشيد أوزّي
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @larabefruitier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ALORS ? Choisis les propositions qui te concernent
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Les signes au dessus ou en dessous des lettres arabes sont des accents
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
☝🏽LA PRONONCIATION DES LETTRES DE CETTE MANIÈRE NE CONCERNE QUE LA LECTURE DU CORAN
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
le son du ض est un gros « D »
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 203,544 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌳 L'ARABE FRUITIER” (@larabefruitier), 1,127 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/larabefruitier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.