Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kwork

Channel

Kwork

@kwork_kwork

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

7,203subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422421914
TypeChannel
Username@kwork_kwork
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kwork_kwork

Growth

7,2037,2237,2136 August 2026 — 7,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,218 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,223 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,221 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,215 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,211 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,205 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,203 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 22 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,200–7,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 19:477,203-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:587,205-6
19 Aug 2026, 01:157,211-4
16 Aug 2026, 07:237,215-6
12 Aug 2026, 16:537,221-2
10 Aug 2026, 02:127,223+5
7 Aug 2026, 10:177,218-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:457,219first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 7,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.772%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held22 (24 March 202618 August 2026)
Views total4,664
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20240.9%
🔥10922.1%
👍7815.8%
😐489.72%
👏479.51%
🥰102.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC624 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Разбираемся, откуда берется творческий кризис, почему референсы и попытки найти вдохновение иногда только усугубляют ситуацию и какие приемы действительно помогают снова включиться в работу👨‍💻

7🔥2👏1

11 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,660 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как за несколько минут понять, подойдет ли вам исполнитель? Рассказываем, на что обращать внимание в отзывах и какие сигналы нельзя пропускать👩‍💻

👍64👏2😐1

4 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,380 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Не каждую задачу в кризис стоит откладывать до лучших времен. В статье – пять антикризисных стратегий, которые помогут сохранить темп работы и быстро решить важные задачи с помощью фрилансеров👨🏻‍💻

7👍2🔥2😐2

28 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,980 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как бренды превращают подписчиков в активное сообщество, зачем нужен комьюнити-маркетинг и кому его делегировать? Разбираемся в статье👩‍💻

6😐3👍2🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,490 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Какие процессы в привлечении клиентов стоит автоматизировать? Как работают чат-боты и парсинг? Какие задачи можно делегировать фрилансерам вместо найма целой команды? Читайте в новой статье👨🏻‍💻

10👍3🔥3

14 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,860 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Разбираемся, почему сильные специалисты остаются незаметными, и показываем, как превратить экспертность в понятный и покупаемый продукт👩🏻‍💻

9👍4👏4🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,220 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Какие рубрики на Kwork выглядят наиболее перспективными по итогам второго квартала 2026 года: анализ конкуренции, индекс востребованности и советы для новичков и опытных фрилансеров👨‍💻

15🔥4👍1🥰1

30 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,520 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Почему владельцы интернет-магазинов тонут в рутине и теряют деньги, пытаясь делать все сами? Какие задачи давно пора делегировать, и почему это ускоряет рост бизнеса? Читайте в статье👨‍💻

11👍5🔥2😐1

23 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,710 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как подготовиться к отдыху так, чтобы спокойно отключиться от рабочих задач, не подвести клиентов и не потерять новые заказы? Читайте в статье!☀️

🔥134👍3👏3😐2

16 Jun 2026, 09:02 UTC≈4,830 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Почему заказ, который кажется работой на пару часов, иногда растягивается на несколько дней? Разбираем три метода оценки сроков, которые помогают точнее планировать нагрузку, избегать авралов и увереннее работать с дедлайнами👩‍💻

10🔥3😐3👍2👏1

9 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,770 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Собрали приемы самопроверки с помощью ИИ, которые помогают находить ошибки, замечать слабые места, сверять результат с ТЗ и снижать количество правок еще до отправки заказчику👨‍💻

11🔥3😐2👍1👏1

2 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,880 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Можно ли стать фрилансером с нуля, как вырасти в профессии и как фриланс может изменить жизнь до неузнаваемости? Читайте в интервью с Анной Литвиновой на Kwork!🤩

16🔥6👍2👏1😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @kwork_kwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kwork” (@kwork_kwork), 7,203 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kwork_kwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.